Thomas Locher
- Computer Networks and Communications top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Information Systems top 10%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Hardware and Architecture top 10%
- Co-authors
- Roger WattenhoferStefan SchmidFabian KühnChristoph LenzenRotem OshmanRogert WattenhoferSrđjan ČapkunDavid Basin
- Topics
- Distributed systems and fault tolerance (11 papers)Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies (9 papers)Caching and Content Delivery (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Thomas Locher
30 papers receiving 444 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Computer Networks and Communications 417
- Artificial Intelligence 108
- Information Systems 88
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 51
- Hardware and Architecture 37
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Locher
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Locher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Locher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Locher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Locher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Locher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Locher. The network helps show where Thomas Locher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Locher
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Locher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Locher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Locher. Thomas Locher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 28 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | Oblivious Gradient Clock Synchronization | 3 |
| 20 | 14 |
About Thomas Locher
Thomas Locher is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 32 papers that have together received 486 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Distributed systems and fault tolerance (11 papers), Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies (9 papers) and Caching and Content Delivery (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Networks and Communications (417 citations), Hardware and Architecture (37 citations) and Information Systems (88 citations). Thomas Locher has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Roger Wattenhofer, Stefan Schmid, Fabian Kühn, Christoph Lenzen, Rotem Oshman, Rogert Wattenhofer, Srđjan Čapkun, David Basin, Aanjhan Ranganathan and Sebastian Obermeier. Their work appears in journals such as Communications of the ACM, Journal of the ACM and Journal of Computer and System Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.