Thomas Lempp

541 citations
20 papers · 317 indexed · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Lempp

17 papers receiving 310 citations

Peers

Thomas Lempp
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 131
  • Clinical Psychology 150
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 88
  • Biological Psychiatry 8
  • Speech and Hearing 20
Replace Pei‐Yin Pan with:
Pei‐Yin Pan Taiwan
Selim El-Badri New Zealand
Bichitra Nanda Patra India
Hojka Gregorič Kumperščak Slovenia
J.P. Selten Netherlands
S R Pliszka United States
Rita Schmid Germany
Samoff A. Mednick United States
Aneta Lakić Serbia
Elena Predescu Romania
Thomas Lempp relative to Pei‐Yin Pan Taiwan Pei‐Yin Pan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Pei‐Yin Pan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Lempp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Lempp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Lempp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Lempp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Lempp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Lempp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Lempp. The network helps show where Thomas Lempp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Lempp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Lempp Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Lempp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201076
2 201456
3 201644
4 201420
5 201519
6 201716
7 202114
8 201212
9 201212
10 201912
11 20129
12 20166
13
THE CLINICAL EXAMINATION OF CHILDREN, ADOLESCENTS AND THEIR FAMILIES
20126
14 20166
15 20194
16 20223
17 20122
18 20230
19 20170
20 20220

About Thomas Lempp

Thomas Lempp is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 20 papers that have together received 317 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (6 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (4 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (3 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers), Health and Medical Studies (3 papers) and Gun Ownership and Violence Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (131 citations), Clinical Psychology (150 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (88 citations), Biological Psychiatry (8 citations) and Speech and Hearing (20 citations). Thomas Lempp has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Christine M. Freitag, Christian Bachmann, Marcel Romanos, Luís Augusto Rohde, Falk Hoffmann, Gerd Glaeske, Daniel Radeloff, Hannah Cholemkery, Mattias Kettner and Monika Heinzel‐Gutenbrunner. Their work appears in journals such as European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, PLoS ONE, Journal of Neural Transmission, Academic Psychiatry and Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact