Thomas Lapole

1.4k total citations
87 papers, 981 citations indexed

About

Thomas Lapole is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Lapole has authored 87 papers receiving a total of 981 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 51 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 47 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and 21 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Thomas Lapole's work include Muscle activation and electromyography studies (49 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (22 papers) and Motor Control and Adaptation (20 papers). Thomas Lapole is often cited by papers focused on Muscle activation and electromyography studies (49 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (22 papers) and Motor Control and Adaptation (20 papers). Thomas Lapole collaborates with scholars based in France, Canada and United Kingdom. Thomas Lapole's co-authors include Guillaume Y. Millet, Robin Souron, Chantal Pérot, Thibault Besson, Vianney Rozand, Léonard Féasson, Michel Petitjean, Antoine Nordez, Stéphane Baudry and Pierrick J. Arnal and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, The Journal of Physiology and Journal of Neurophysiology.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Lapole

80 papers receiving 972 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas Lapole France 18 521 486 194 150 126 87 981
Gregory E. P. Pearcey Canada 19 468 0.9× 536 1.1× 276 1.4× 194 1.3× 135 1.1× 49 1.2k
Riann M. Palmieri United States 16 871 1.7× 649 1.3× 121 0.6× 172 1.1× 169 1.3× 28 1.6k
Omar S. Mian United Kingdom 21 332 0.6× 440 0.9× 227 1.2× 232 1.5× 63 0.5× 40 1.3k
Malgorzata Klass Belgium 18 569 1.1× 872 1.8× 367 1.9× 187 1.2× 101 0.8× 42 1.4k
Christopher A. Knight United States 25 700 1.3× 842 1.7× 300 1.5× 99 0.7× 86 0.7× 51 1.5k
Stéphane Baudry Belgium 21 290 0.6× 521 1.1× 460 2.4× 359 2.4× 156 1.2× 55 1.3k
Ioannis G. Amiridis Greece 18 482 0.9× 521 1.1× 231 1.2× 88 0.6× 109 0.9× 59 1.1k
D. M. Koceja United States 16 393 0.8× 366 0.8× 186 1.0× 153 1.0× 95 0.8× 33 862
M. Pensini France 13 405 0.8× 383 0.8× 152 0.8× 168 1.1× 52 0.4× 16 736
David M. Koceja United States 26 527 1.0× 513 1.1× 350 1.8× 363 2.4× 197 1.6× 77 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Lapole

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Lapole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Lapole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Lapole more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Lapole

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Lapole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Lapole. The network helps show where Thomas Lapole may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Lapole

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Lapole. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Lapole based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Lapole. Thomas Lapole is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
3.
Grosprêtre, Sidney, et al.. (2024). Do soleus responses to transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation show similar changes to H-reflex in response to Achilles tendon vibration?. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 124(6). 1821–1833. 3 indexed citations
5.
Lapole, Thomas, et al.. (2024). Effects of prolonged vibration to the flexor carpi radialis muscle on intracortical excitability. Scientific Reports. 14(1). 8475–8475. 1 indexed citations
6.
Souron, Robin, Benjamin Pageaux, Aymeric Guillot, et al.. (2024). Enhancing endurance performance with combined imagined and actual physical practice. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 124(10). 3005–3020.
7.
Lapole, Thomas, et al.. (2023). Can local vibration alter the contribution of persistent inward currents to human motoneuron firing?. The Journal of Physiology. 601(8). 1467–1482. 11 indexed citations
8.
Lapole, Thomas, et al.. (2023). Effects of prolonged local vibration superimposed to muscle contraction on motoneuronal and cortical excitability. Frontiers in Physiology. 14. 1106387–1106387. 9 indexed citations
9.
Brownstein, Callum G., Julien Gondin, Guillaume Y. Millet, et al.. (2023). Acute effects of conventional versus wide‐pulse neuromuscular electrical stimulation on quadriceps evoked torque and neuromuscular function. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports. 33(8). 1307–1321. 1 indexed citations
10.
Lapole, Thomas, et al.. (2023). Wide-pulse electrical stimulation of the quadriceps allows greater maximal evocable torque than conventional stimulation. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 123(6). 1209–1214. 3 indexed citations
11.
Lapole, Thomas, Caroline Nicol, Cécile Martha, et al.. (2023). How about running on Mars? Influence of sensorimotor coherence on running and spatial perception in simulated reduced gravity. Frontiers in Physiology. 14. 1201253–1201253. 1 indexed citations
12.
Millet, Guillaume Y., et al.. (2023). Measuring objective fatigability and autonomic dysfunction in clinical populations: How and why?. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. 5. 1140833–1140833. 9 indexed citations
13.
Samozino, Pierre, Frédérique Hintzy, Grégoire P. Millet, et al.. (2022). Neuromuscular fatigability during repeated sprints assessed with an innovative cycle ergometer. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 122(5). 1189–1204. 6 indexed citations
14.
Morel, Jérôme, et al.. (2022). Prevalence of self-reported fatigue in intensive care unit survivors 6 months–5 years after discharge. Scientific Reports. 12(1). 5631–5631. 14 indexed citations
15.
Féasson, Léonard, et al.. (2022). Very old adults show impaired fatigue resistance compared to old adults independently of sex during a knee-extensors isometric test. Experimental Gerontology. 161. 111732–111732. 6 indexed citations
16.
Féasson, Léonard, et al.. (2022). Acute effects of quadriceps muscle versus tendon prolonged local vibration on force production capacities and central nervous system excitability. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 122(11). 2451–2461. 10 indexed citations
17.
Rozand, Vianney, et al.. (2021). Influence of wide-pulse neuromuscular electrical stimulation frequency and superimposed tendon vibration on occurrence and magnitude of extra torque. Journal of Applied Physiology. 131(1). 302–312. 11 indexed citations
18.
Lapole, Thomas, et al.. (2021). Bedside voluntary and evoked forces evaluation in intensive care unit patients: a narrative review. Critical Care. 25(1). 157–157. 11 indexed citations
19.
Souron, Robin, et al.. (2016). Effects of an 8-week local vibration training on corticospinal properties of the tibialis anterior muscle. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 59. e52–e52. 1 indexed citations
20.
Michel, Fabrice, S. Aubry, Rodolphe Testa, et al.. (2015). Reliability of 2D ultrasound imaging associated with transient ShearWave Elastography method to analyze spastic gastrocnemius medialis muscle architecture and viscoelastic properties. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 58. e75–e75. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026