Thomas K. Green

40 total papers · 783 total citations
29 papers, 642 citations indexed

About

Thomas K. Green is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Spectroscopy and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas K. Green has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 642 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Organic Chemistry, 9 papers in Spectroscopy and 7 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Thomas K. Green's work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (6 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (4 papers) and Axial and Atropisomeric Chirality Synthesis (3 papers). Thomas K. Green is often cited by papers focused on Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (6 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (4 papers) and Axial and Atropisomeric Chirality Synthesis (3 papers). Thomas K. Green collaborates with scholars based in United States, Norway and France. Thomas K. Green's co-authors include John W. Larsen, Jeffrey Kovac, John A. Harvey, Perry S. Barboza, T. Aaron West, Svein D. Mathiesen, Lars P. Folkow, Monica A. Sundset, Arnoldus Schytte Blix and William G. Lloyd and has published in prestigious journals such as Analytical Chemistry, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B and Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

In The Last Decade

Thomas K. Green

28 papers receiving 605 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Thomas K. Green	185	166	108	104	102	29	642
Deane D. McIntyre	71 0.4×	39 0.2×	51 0.5×	125 1.2×	51 0.5×	30	590
David S. Ross	37 0.2×	261 1.6×	16 0.1×	122 1.2×	43 0.4×	44	775
Neil Robinson	144 0.8×	97 0.6×	151 1.4×	54 0.5×	28 0.3×	36	767
Nugent F. Chamberlain	196 1.1×	80 0.5×	122 1.1×	85 0.8×	10 0.1×	14	714
Robert J. Kauten	45 0.2×	71 0.4×	170 1.6×	161 1.5×	22 0.2×	33	714
Yasutoshi Kasahara	68 0.4×	144 0.9×	29 0.3×	51 0.5×	21 0.2×	37	616
Ronald Liotta	53 0.3×	200 1.2×	92 0.9×	49 0.5×	190 1.9×	18	701
Gianfranco Guglielmetti	138 0.7×	60 0.4×	10 0.1×	88 0.8×	37 0.4×	24	610
Chong Li	123 0.7×	244 1.5×	12 0.1×	112 1.1×	45 0.4×	36	646
Gianni Ferrante	190 1.0×	46 0.3×	305 2.8×	39 0.4×	40 0.4×	24	606

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas K. Green

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas K. Green's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas K. Green with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas K. Green more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas K. Green

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas K. Green. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas K. Green. The network helps show where Thomas K. Green may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas K. Green

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas K. Green. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas K. Green based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas K. Green. Thomas K. Green is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact