Thomas Jahn

23 papers receiving 233 citations

Peers

Thomas Jahn
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Instrumentation 18
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 65
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 76
  • Computational Mathematics 2
  • Numerical Analysis 16
Replace Ayumu Yamashita with:
Ayumu Yamashita Japan
Andreas Robert Formiconi Italy
Paweł Markiewicz United Kingdom
Lukas Snoek Netherlands
M. Delfino Spain
Johnson GadElkarim United States
Maziar Yaesoubi United States
Corey Jones United States
Simon Glynn United States
Thomas Jahn relative to Ayumu Yamashita Japan Ayumu Yamashita's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Ayumu Yamashita · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Jahn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Jahn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Jahn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Jahn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Jahn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Jahn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Jahn. The network helps show where Thomas Jahn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Jahn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Jahn Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Jahn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999113
2 199628
3 202316
4 201313
5 202111
6 200110
7 20147
8 20226
9 20126
10
Minsum Location Extended to Gauges and to Convex Sets⋆
20165
11 20165
12 20124
13 20243
14 20182
15 20132
16 20222
17 20172
18 20251
19 20251
20 20141

About Thomas Jahn

Thomas Jahn is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation, Applied Mathematics, Numerical Analysis and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 241 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (7 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (6 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (4 papers), Mathematical Approximation and Integration (3 papers), Point processes and geometric inequalities (2 papers), Optimization and Variational Analysis (2 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Approximation Theory and Sequence Spaces (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (18 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (65 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (76 citations), Computational Mathematics (2 citations) and Numerical Analysis (16 citations). Thomas Jahn has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Johannes Schröder, K. Baudendistel, Marco Essig, Lothar R. Schad, Michael V. Knopp, Tino Ullrich, Christian Richter, Felix Voigtlaender, Frederik Wenz and Georg Kerkhoff. Their work appears in journals such as Constructive Approximation, Cortex, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact