Thomas J. Walton

3.4k total citations
38 papers, 752 citations indexed

About

Thomas J. Walton is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Urology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas J. Walton has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 752 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Surgery, 20 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 8 papers in Urology. Recurrent topics in Thomas J. Walton's work include Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (12 papers), Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies (11 papers) and Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (10 papers). Thomas J. Walton is often cited by papers focused on Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (12 papers), Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies (11 papers) and Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (10 papers). Thomas J. Walton collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Japan. Thomas J. Walton's co-authors include Shahrokh F. Shariat, Christian Seitz, Kazumasa Matsumoto, Wassim Kassouf, Giacomo Novara, Juan Ignacio Martínez‐Salamanca, Pierre I. Karakiewicz, Vincenzo Ficarra, Hans‐Martin Fritsche and Patrick J. Bastian and has published in prestigious journals such as Gut, The Journal of Urology and European Urology.

In The Last Decade

Thomas J. Walton

36 papers receiving 736 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas J. Walton United Kingdom 13 636 217 189 117 58 38 752
Óscar Rodríguez-Faba Spain 17 490 0.8× 177 0.8× 253 1.3× 118 1.0× 27 0.5× 59 747
R. Dumont Spain 14 496 0.8× 228 1.1× 176 0.9× 69 0.6× 30 0.5× 36 673
Scott G. Hubosky United States 16 293 0.5× 125 0.6× 306 1.6× 65 0.6× 22 0.4× 43 576
H. Quintens France 11 327 0.5× 136 0.6× 101 0.5× 63 0.5× 16 0.3× 36 427
M. Bürger Germany 14 333 0.5× 138 0.6× 111 0.6× 70 0.6× 24 0.4× 49 571
Kunlin Yang China 18 378 0.6× 391 1.8× 258 1.4× 67 0.6× 9 0.2× 100 828
Philippe Koenig France 7 317 0.5× 68 0.3× 280 1.5× 104 0.9× 22 0.4× 15 538
Ehab R. Tawfiek Egypt 9 247 0.4× 136 0.6× 342 1.8× 47 0.4× 12 0.2× 33 601
U. K. Wenderoth Germany 12 368 0.6× 323 1.5× 217 1.1× 52 0.4× 17 0.3× 21 673
J.V. Ricós Spain 16 855 1.3× 438 2.0× 238 1.3× 93 0.8× 33 0.6× 41 984

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas J. Walton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas J. Walton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas J. Walton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas J. Walton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas J. Walton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas J. Walton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas J. Walton. The network helps show where Thomas J. Walton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas J. Walton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas J. Walton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas J. Walton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas J. Walton. Thomas J. Walton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Walton, Thomas J., Sarah L. Whitehouse, Alastair Ross, et al.. (2025). Intraoperative Cell Salvage for Revision Hip Arthroplasty. JBJS Open Access. 10(3).
2.
Walton, Thomas J., et al.. (2024). Hip and knee replacement in lower limb amputees: a scoping review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 25(1). 239–239.
3.
Walton, Thomas J., et al.. (2023). Intraoperative cell salvage in revision hip arthroplasty. The Bone & Joint Journal. 105-B(10). 1038–1044. 2 indexed citations
4.
Yao, Henry H., et al.. (2021). Effect of transperineal template prostate biopsy on perioperative and functional outcomes following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Journal of Clinical Urology. 15(4). 331–340. 1 indexed citations
5.
John, Joseph, John M. Pascoe, Sarah Fowler, et al.. (2021). A nationwide trend away from radical prostatectomy for Gleason Grade Group 1 prostate cancer. British Journal of Urology. 129(3). 311–314. 1 indexed citations
6.
Yao, Henry H., et al.. (2020). Robotic Culp de Weerd Pyeloplasty for Secondary Pelviureteral Junction Obstruction. Videourology. 35(2). 1 indexed citations
8.
Nuhn, Philipp, Giacomo Novara, Christian Seitz, et al.. (2014). Prognostic value of prior history of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: results from a retrospective multicenter study. World Journal of Urology. 33(7). 1005–1013. 12 indexed citations
9.
Green, William H., et al.. (2014). Very high residual volumes should not prevent transurethral resection of the prostate being offered to men presenting with urinary retention. Scandinavian Journal of Urology. 48(6). 549–553. 8 indexed citations
10.
Otto, Wolfgang, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Hans‐Martin Fritsche, et al.. (2011). Concomitant carcinoma in situ as an independent prognostic parameter for recurrence and survival in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter analysis of 772 patients. World Journal of Urology. 29(4). 487–494. 52 indexed citations
11.
12.
Murphy, Declan G., Thomas J. Walton, Stephen S. Connolly, & Anthony J. Costello. (2011). FOCAL THERAPY FOR LOCALISED PROSTATE CANCER: ARE WE ASKING THE CORRECT RESEARCH QUESTIONS?. British Journal of Urology. 109(1). 1–3. 6 indexed citations
14.
Martínez‐Salamanca, Juan Ignacio, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Joaquı́n Carballido, et al.. (2011). Prognostic role of ECOG performance status in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: an international study. British Journal of Urology. 109(8). 1155–1161. 33 indexed citations
15.
Novara, Giacomo, Kazumasa Matsumoto, Wassim Kassouf, et al.. (2010). Prognostic Role of Lymphovascular Invasion in Patients with Urothelial Carcinoma of the Upper Urinary Tract: An International Validation Study. European Urology. 57(6). 1064–1071. 135 indexed citations
16.
Walton, Thomas J., Giacomo Novara, Kazumasa Matsumoto, et al.. (2010). Oncological outcomes after laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy: results from an international cohort. British Journal of Urology. 108(3). 406–412. 71 indexed citations
17.
Walton, Thomas J., Geng Li, Thomas A. McCulloch, et al.. (2009). Quantitative RT‐PCR analysis of estrogen receptor gene expression in laser microdissected prostate cancer tissue. The Prostate. 69(8). 810–819. 23 indexed citations
18.
Walton, Thomas J., Rajpal Dhingsa, Philip Kaye, & Dileep N. Lobo. (2009). Imaging after medically managed severe acute cholecystitis. Gut. 58(3). 421–421. 3 indexed citations
19.
Walton, Thomas J., Thomas A. McCulloch, Robert C. Rees, & M.C. Bishop. (2005). Obtaining fresh prostate cancer tissue for research: A novel biopsy needle and sampling technique for radical prostatectomy specimens. The Prostate. 64(4). 382–386. 15 indexed citations
20.
Walton, Thomas J., N. J. Samani, & Richard Andrews. (2002). Systemic cholesterol crystal embolisation with pulmonary involvement: a fatal combination after coronary angiography. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 78(919). 288–289. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026