Thomas J. Milburn
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 5%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 1%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Jörg DopplerStefan RotterPeter RablUlrich KuhlFlorian LibischJulian BöhmAlexei A. MailybaevNimrod Moiseyev
- Topics
- Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics (3 papers)Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (2 papers)Nonlinear Photonic Systems (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Statistical and Nonlinear PhysicsAtomic and Molecular Physics, and OpticsElectronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- Partner nations
- AustriaAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Thomas J. Milburn
3 papers receiving 890 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 891
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 597
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 70
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 54
- Artificial Intelligence 51
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas J. Milburn
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas J. Milburn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas J. Milburn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas J. Milburn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas J. Milburn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas J. Milburn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas J. Milburn. The network helps show where Thomas J. Milburn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas J. Milburn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas J. Milburn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas J. Milburn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas J. Milburn. Thomas J. Milburn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dynamically encircling an exceptional point for asymmetric mode switchingbreakdown → | 749 |
| 2 | 24 | |
| 3 | 146 | |
| 4 | General dynamical description of quasi-adiabatically encircling exceptional points | 0 |
About Thomas J. Milburn
Thomas J. Milburn is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Organic Chemistry, having authored 4 papers that have together received 919 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics (3 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (2 papers) and Nonlinear Photonic Systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (597 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (891 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (54 citations). Thomas J. Milburn has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jörg Doppler, Stefan Rotter, Peter Rabl, Ulrich Kuhl, Florian Libisch, Julian Böhm, Alexei A. Mailybaev, Nimrod Moiseyev, C. A. Holmes and S. Portolan. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Physical Review A and Physical review. A.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.