Thomas J. Hine

415 total citations
6 papers, 195 citations indexed

About

Thomas J. Hine is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Reproductive Medicine and Infectious Diseases. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas J. Hine has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 195 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 1 paper in Political Science and International Relations, 1 paper in Reproductive Medicine and 0 papers in Infectious Diseases. Recurrent topics in Thomas J. Hine's work include Legal Cases and Commentary (1 paper) and Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (1 paper). Thomas J. Hine is often cited by papers focused on Legal Cases and Commentary (1 paper) and Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (1 paper). Thomas J. Hine collaborates with scholars based in . Thomas J. Hine's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as Little, Brown eBooks and Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

Thomas J. Hine

6 papers receiving 154 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas J. Hine	5	60	58	44	43	32	6	195
David Rivett Ukraine	4	43 0.7×	122 2.1×	63 1.4×	19 0.4×	9 0.3×	6	318
Gaëlle Boulbry France	9	98 1.6×	87 1.5×	160 3.6×	83 1.9×	20 0.6×	14	301
Morgan Poor United States	9	71 1.2×	165 2.8×	94 2.1×	47 1.1×	46 1.4×	10	316
Hila Riemer Israel	7	114 1.9×	103 1.8×	121 2.8×	46 1.1×	8 0.3×	12	297
Roberta Crouch Australia	11	64 1.1×	195 3.4×	80 1.8×	24 0.6×	34 1.1×	21	314
Steven S. Chan United States	4	69 1.1×	135 2.3×	90 2.0×	24 0.6×	51 1.6×	5	321
Magdalena Zawisza United Kingdom	8	38 0.6×	88 1.5×	90 2.0×	14 0.3×	12 0.4×	23	212
David Robinson South Africa	5	36 0.6×	6 0.1×	117 2.7×	14 0.3×	15 0.5×	20	227
Sean P. Coary United States	5	28 0.5×	21 0.4×	112 2.5×	15 0.3×	19 0.6×	6	178
Hannah U. Nohlen Netherlands	7	78 1.3×	49 0.8×	86 2.0×	50 1.2×	8 0.3×	10	228

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas J. Hine

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas J. Hine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas J. Hine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas J. Hine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas J. Hine

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas J. Hine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas J. Hine. The network helps show where Thomas J. Hine may publish in the future.

No nodes

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Hine, Thomas J., et al.. (2007). NASD Arbitration Solution: Five Black Belt Principles to Protect and Grow Your Financial Services Practice. 1 indexed citations

2.

Hine, Thomas J.. (2002). I Want That!: How We All Became Shoppers. 11 indexed citations

3.

Hine, Thomas J.. (2001). The Total Package: The Evolution and Secret Meanings of Boxes, Bottles, Cans and Tubes. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 16 indexed citations

4.

Hine, Thomas J.. (1999). The Rise and Fall of the American Teenager. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 67 indexed citations

5.

Hine, Thomas J.. (1997). The total package : the secret history and hidden meanings of boxes, bottles, cans, and other persuasive containers. Little, Brown eBooks. 66 indexed citations

6.

Hine, Thomas J.. (1995). The Total Package. 34 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact