Thomas J. Gal

3.7k citations
107 papers · 2.5k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas J. Gal

104 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Thomas J. Gal
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Otorhinolaryngology 253
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 300
  • Surgery 636
  • Sensory Systems 73
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 439
Replace Sanford M. Archer with:
Sanford M. Archer United States
Howard B. Panitch United States
Peter C. Belafsky United States
Lorraine C. Nnacheta United States
O. Mundler France
Shih‐Feng Weng Taiwan
Robert J. Stachler United States
Daniel KL Cheuk Hong Kong
Gayle E. Woodson United States
Brian Rotenberg Canada
Thomas J. Gal relative to Sanford M. Archer United States Sanford M. Archer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Sanford M. Archer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas J. Gal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas J. Gal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas J. Gal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas J. Gal more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas J. Gal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas J. Gal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas J. Gal. The network helps show where Thomas J. Gal may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas J. Gal, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas J. Gal Line = papers co-authored together Thomas J. Gal links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 107 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000105
2 201099
3 201198
4 197595
5 200790
6 198288
7 200380
8 198979
9 201075
10 198170
11 201365
12 201161
13 201757
14 199957
15 200555
16 198653
17 201451
18 200547
19 198647
20 199845

About Thomas J. Gal

Thomas J. Gal is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Physiology and Otorhinolaryngology, having authored 107 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (16 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (15 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (11 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (10 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (6 papers), Dysphagia Assessment and Management (5 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (5 papers) and Asthma and respiratory diseases (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (253 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (300 citations), Surgery (636 citations), Sensory Systems (73 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (439 citations). Thomas J. Gal has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Cosmo A. DiFazio, Bin Huang, Douglas W. Klotch, Paul M. Suratt, Lee H. Cooperman, Jennifer B. Shinn, N. S. Arora, Neal D. Futran, Joseph Brennan and Natalie L. Silver. Their work appears in journals such as Otolaryngology, Anesthesiology, Anesthesia & Analgesia, The Laryngoscope and American Journal of Otolaryngology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact