Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Cosmological Framework for the Co‐evolution of Quasars, Supermassive Black Holes, and Elliptical Galaxies. I. Galaxy Mergers and Quasar Activity
2008906 citationsPhilip F. Hopkins, Lars Hernquist et al.profile →
A semi-analytic model for the co-evolution of galaxies, black holes and active galactic nuclei
2008719 citationsRachel S. Somerville, Philip F. Hopkins et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Societyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas J. Cox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas J. Cox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas J. Cox more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas J. Cox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas J. Cox. The network helps show where Thomas J. Cox may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas J. Cox
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas J. Cox.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas J. Cox based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas J. Cox. Thomas J. Cox is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Novak, Gregory S., Patrik Jönsson, Joel R. Primack, Thomas J. Cox, & Avishai Dekel. (2012). On galaxies and homology. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 424(1). 635–648.5 indexed citations
Loeb, Abraham & Thomas J. Cox. (2008). Our Galaxy's date with destruction. 36(6). 28–33.1 indexed citations
4.
Cox, Thomas J., Patrik Jönsson, Rachel S. Somerville, Joel R. Primack, & Avishai Dekel. (2008). The effect of galaxy mass ratio on merger-driven starbursts. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 384(1). 386–409.293 indexed citations
Cox, Thomas J., Patrik Jönsson, Joel R. Primack, & Rachel S. Somerville. (2005). The effects of feedback in simulations of disk-galaxy major mergers. arXiv (Cornell University).1 indexed citations
Cox, Thomas J.. (2004). Star formation and feedback in simulations of interacting galaxies. PhDT. 6432.1 indexed citations
13.
Bratti, M. Concepción, Ana Cecilia Rodríguez, Mark Schiffman, et al.. (2004). Description of a seven-year prospective study of human papillomavirus infection and cervical neoplasia among 10 000 women in Guanacaste, Costa Rica Descripción de un estudio prospectivo de siete años sobre la infección por el virus del papiloma humano y el cáncer cervicouterino en 10 000 mujeres de Guanacaste, Costa Rica. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
Cox, Thomas J.. (1986). Remedies for Subjunctive Anxiety.. The French review. 60(1). 65–70.1 indexed citations
20.
Cox, Thomas J.. (1983). Teaching the Unteachable: Prepositional Complementizers in French.. The French review. 57(2).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.