Thomas H. Good

497 total citations
9 papers, 381 citations indexed

About

Thomas H. Good is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas H. Good has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 381 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 5 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 3 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Thomas H. Good's work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (3 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (3 papers) and Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (2 papers). Thomas H. Good is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (3 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (3 papers) and Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (2 papers). Thomas H. Good collaborates with scholars based in United States. Thomas H. Good's co-authors include Geoffrey O. Hartzler, James H. O’Keefe, Robert W. Ligon, Ben D. McCallister, Lee V. Giorgi, Anthony Magalski, Michael L. Main, David R. McConahay, David Steinhaus and James E. Crockett and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, The American Journal of Cardiology and American Heart Journal.

In The Last Decade

Thomas H. Good

9 papers receiving 366 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas H. Good United States 7 282 230 219 77 36 9 381
Tadamichi Sakuma Japan 10 250 0.9× 264 1.1× 180 0.8× 135 1.8× 29 0.8× 17 433
K. Soon Australia 10 206 0.7× 183 0.8× 180 0.8× 57 0.7× 48 1.3× 27 365
Vito Marangelli Italy 9 472 1.7× 348 1.5× 151 0.7× 40 0.5× 50 1.4× 22 552
Periyanan Vaduganathan United States 8 415 1.5× 452 2.0× 111 0.5× 83 1.1× 79 2.2× 11 599
Giovanni Seveso Italy 6 302 1.1× 236 1.0× 133 0.6× 20 0.3× 18 0.5× 10 352
Nick Fisher New Zealand 6 127 0.5× 128 0.6× 90 0.4× 80 1.0× 23 0.6× 14 241
Carol Mechem United States 7 486 1.7× 451 2.0× 419 1.9× 37 0.5× 47 1.3× 14 590
Mariapina Madonna Italy 6 230 0.8× 159 0.7× 106 0.5× 40 0.5× 11 0.3× 10 287
R. Kovacs United States 7 532 1.9× 504 2.2× 214 1.0× 81 1.1× 81 2.3× 8 671
Meeney Dhir United States 3 362 1.3× 137 0.6× 81 0.4× 22 0.3× 39 1.1× 6 399

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas H. Good

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas H. Good's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas H. Good with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas H. Good more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas H. Good

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas H. Good. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas H. Good. The network helps show where Thomas H. Good may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas H. Good

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas H. Good. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas H. Good based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas H. Good. Thomas H. Good is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Khariton, Yevgeniy, et al.. (2014). Impact of Transesophageal Echocardiography on Management in Patients With Suspected Cardioembolic Stroke. The American Journal of Cardiology. 114(12). 1912–1916. 12 indexed citations
2.
Skogen, Karoline, Balaji Ganeshan, Thomas H. Good, Giles Critchley, & Kenneth A. Miles. (2011). Imaging heterogeneity in gliomas using texture analysis. Cancer Imaging. 11(1A). S113–S113. 12 indexed citations
3.
Main, Michael L., et al.. (2003). Real-time assessment of myocardial perfusion during balloon angioplasty of the left anterior descending coronary artery. The American Journal of Cardiology. 92(6). 656–659. 5 indexed citations
4.
Main, Michael L., et al.. (2002). Combined assessment of microvascular integrity and contractile reserve improves differentiation of stunning and necrosis after acute anterior wall myocardial infarction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 40(6). 1079–1084. 30 indexed citations
5.
6.
Gura, George M., et al.. (1996). Nonsurgical Repair of Femoral Artery Pseudoaneurysm with Color Flow Guided Ultrasound Transducer Compression. Echocardiography. 13(3). 297–301. 4 indexed citations
7.
O’Keefe, James H., Lee V. Giorgi, Geoffrey O. Hartzler, et al.. (1991). Effects of diltiazem on complications and restenosis after coronary angioplasty. The American Journal of Cardiology. 67(5). 373–376. 50 indexed citations
8.
Stone, Gregg W., et al.. (1990). Lipomatous hypertrophy of the interatrialseptum: Diagnosis by percutaneous transvenous biopsy. American Heart Journal. 119(2). 406–408. 14 indexed citations
9.
O’Keefe, James H., Barry D. Rutherford, David R. McConahay, et al.. (1989). Early and late results of coronary angioplasty without antecedent thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The American Journal of Cardiology. 64(19). 1221–1230. 192 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026