Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas G. Carne
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas G. Carne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas G. Carne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas G. Carne more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas G. Carne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas G. Carne. The network helps show where Thomas G. Carne may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas G. Carne
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas G. Carne.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas G. Carne based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas G. Carne. Thomas G. Carne is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Carne, Thomas G., et al.. (2007). Model Validation of a Complex Aerospace Structure.. Sound&Vibration. 42(11). 10–15.5 indexed citations
3.
Sumali, Hartono & Thomas G. Carne. (2007). Air Damping on Micro-Cantilever Beams.. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).2 indexed citations
4.
Carne, Thomas G., et al.. (2006). Support Conditions for Free Boundary-Condition Modal Testing.. Sound&Vibration.15 indexed citations
5.
Carne, Thomas G., et al.. (2004). Combining Test-Based and Finite Element-Based Models in NASTRAN. Sound&Vibration. 38(4). 18–21.2 indexed citations
6.
Carne, Thomas G., et al.. (2001). Importance of coating structure for sheet-fed offset print quality. 129(7). 426–432.4 indexed citations
7.
Anderson, Mark C., T. K. Hasselman, & Thomas G. Carne. (1999). Model correlation and updating of a nonlinear finite element model using crush test data. 3727. 1511–1517.5 indexed citations
8.
Carne, Thomas G., et al.. (1998). Modal parameter extraction using natural excitation response data. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 3727. 49–55.1 indexed citations
Carne, Thomas G. & Clark R. Dohrmann. (1994). A modal test design strategy for model correlation. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).76 indexed citations
Carne, Thomas G., et al.. (1988). A comparison of fixed-base and driven-base modal testing of an electronics package. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N. 89. 11240.5 indexed citations
17.
Lauffer, J.P., Thomas G. Carne, & Thomas D. Ashwill. (1988). Modal testing in the design evaluation of wind turbines. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N. 88. 27632.5 indexed citations
Carne, Thomas G., et al.. (1982). Modal testing of a rotating wind turbine. STIN. 83. 21526.13 indexed citations
20.
Carne, Thomas G., et al.. (1981). Vertical axis wind turbine drive train transient dynamics. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N. 81. 25559–314.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.