Thomas E. St. Amour

488 total citations
10 papers, 347 citations indexed

About

Thomas E. St. Amour is a scholar working on Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Spectroscopy. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas E. St. Amour has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 347 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Surgery, 3 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 3 papers in Spectroscopy. Recurrent topics in Thomas E. St. Amour's work include Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (3 papers), Peripheral Nerve Disorders (2 papers) and Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (2 papers). Thomas E. St. Amour is often cited by papers focused on Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (3 papers), Peripheral Nerve Disorders (2 papers) and Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (2 papers). Thomas E. St. Amour collaborates with scholars based in United States. Thomas E. St. Amour's co-authors include Marilyn J. Siegel, Daniel Fiat, M. Burgar, H S Glazer, George J. Dohrmann, Jonathan M. Rubin, H S Glazer, Charles A. James, S N Nadel and Charles M. Glasier and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Journal of Physical Chemistry and Radiology.

In The Last Decade

Thomas E. St. Amour

9 papers receiving 332 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas E. St. Amour United States	8	153	77	70	49	39	10	347
Donald R. Marshall Australia	14	206 1.3×	22 0.3×	149 2.1×	35 0.7×	61 1.6×	48	639
Philip Hammond United Kingdom	13	162 1.1×	33 0.4×	179 2.6×	14 0.3×	43 1.1×	39	428
Takashi Tahara Japan	12	115 0.8×	20 0.3×	71 1.0×	17 0.3×	64 1.6×	17	664
Tetsuya Tanabe Japan	12	99 0.6×	43 0.6×	27 0.4×	11 0.2×	75 1.9×	65	480
H. van Langen Netherlands	15	75 0.5×	62 0.8×	55 0.8×	26 0.5×	161 4.1×	36	603
H Mestdagh France	17	823 5.4×	275 3.6×	55 0.8×	13 0.3×	75 1.9×	97	1.4k
K. Harada Japan	14	70 0.5×	27 0.4×	15 0.2×	17 0.3×	96 2.5×	36	473
Joern J.W. Sandstede Germany	13	83 0.5×	47 0.6×	53 0.8×	28 0.6×	117 3.0×	22	899
Jürgen Graf Germany	14	288 1.9×	15 0.2×	150 2.1×	50 1.0×	79 2.0×	37	829
Sebastian Reiter Germany	16	42 0.3×	21 0.3×	147 2.1×	46 0.9×	198 5.1×	45	671

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. St. Amour

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. St. Amour's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. St. Amour with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. St. Amour more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. St. Amour

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. St. Amour. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. St. Amour. The network helps show where Thomas E. St. Amour may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas E. St. Amour

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas E. St. Amour. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas E. St. Amour based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas E. St. Amour. Thomas E. St. Amour is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Amour, Thomas E. St., Charles A. James, & Charles M. Glasier. (1994). MRI of the spine. Raven Press eBooks. 16 indexed citations

2.

Siegel, Marilyn J., et al.. (1989). Lymphangiomas in children: MR imaging.. Radiology. 170(2). 467–470. 124 indexed citations

3.

Amour, Thomas E. St., Fernando R. Gutiérrez, Robert G. Levitt, & Robert C. McKnight. (1988). CT Diagnosis of Type A Aortic Dissections not Demonstrated by Aortography. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 12(6). 963–967. 10 indexed citations

4.

Siegel, Marilyn J., Thomas E. St. Amour, & Barry A. Siegel. (1987). Imaging techniques in the evaluation of pediatric hypertension. Pediatric Nephrology. 1(1). 76–88. 12 indexed citations

5.

Amour, Thomas E. St., Marilyn J. Siegel, H S Glazer, & S N Nadel. (1987). CT Appearances of the Normal and Abnormal Thymus in Childhood. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 11(4). 645–650. 21 indexed citations

6.

McClennan, Bruce L., Thomas E. St. Amour, & Donald B. Miller. (1986). Voiding symptoms and periurethral mass. Urologic Radiology. 8(1). 219–221.

7.

Amour, Thomas E. St., Jonathan M. Rubin, & George J. Dohrmann. (1984). The central canal of the spinal cord: ultrasonic identification.. Radiology. 152(3). 767–769. 18 indexed citations

8.

Amour, Thomas E. St., et al.. (1984). A ¹⁷O NMR study of the protonation of urea. Organic Magnetic Resonance. 22(11). 697–700. 7 indexed citations

9.

Burgar, M., Thomas E. St. Amour, & Daniel Fiat. (1981). Oxygen-17 and nitrogen-14 NMR studies of amide systems. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 85(5). 502–510. 49 indexed citations

10.

Amour, Thomas E. St., et al.. (1981). Oxygen-17 NMR studies of substituent and hydrogen-bonding effects in substituted acetophenones and benzaldehydes. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 103(5). 1128–1136. 90 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact