Thomas E. Hines

1.1k total citations
62 papers, 894 citations indexed

About

Thomas E. Hines is a scholar working on Plant Science, Pollution and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas E. Hines has authored 62 papers receiving a total of 894 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 57 papers in Plant Science, 21 papers in Pollution and 11 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Thomas E. Hines's work include Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (50 papers), Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (21 papers) and Nematode management and characterization studies (14 papers). Thomas E. Hines is often cited by papers focused on Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (50 papers), Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (21 papers) and Nematode management and characterization studies (14 papers). Thomas E. Hines collaborates with scholars based in United States. Thomas E. Hines's co-authors include Henry P. Wilson, Gregory R. Armel, Robert J. Richardson, William A. Bailey, Robin R. Bellinder, Daniel H. Poston, Kriton K. Hatzios, William K. Vencill, D. A. Herbert and Mary F. Lopez and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Weed Science and HortScience.

In The Last Decade

Thomas E. Hines

61 papers receiving 819 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas E. Hines United States 18 805 359 199 110 72 62 894
J. C. Caseley United Kingdom 16 752 0.9× 408 1.1× 112 0.6× 162 1.5× 78 1.1× 48 851
Henry P. Wilson United States 21 1.4k 1.7× 642 1.8× 295 1.5× 216 2.0× 140 1.9× 97 1.5k
Michelangelo Müzell Trezzi Brazil 16 993 1.2× 354 1.0× 166 0.8× 137 1.2× 37 0.5× 115 1.1k
Gregory R. Armel United States 16 528 0.7× 274 0.8× 94 0.5× 81 0.7× 69 1.0× 51 623
Richard Behrens United States 17 598 0.7× 343 1.0× 54 0.3× 66 0.6× 87 1.2× 42 744
Jane P. Barnes United States 7 859 1.1× 71 0.2× 286 1.4× 53 0.5× 89 1.2× 8 940
Jessica Kelton United States 7 356 0.4× 131 0.4× 109 0.5× 55 0.5× 24 0.3× 11 455
Maria Olofsdotter Philippines 16 1.0k 1.3× 71 0.2× 110 0.6× 100 0.9× 60 0.8× 26 1.1k
Zahid Ata Cheema Pakistan 21 1.5k 1.9× 55 0.2× 342 1.7× 103 0.9× 54 0.8× 51 1.6k
Antonia M. Rojano‐Delgado Spain 18 1.0k 1.3× 730 2.0× 76 0.4× 534 4.9× 29 0.4× 49 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Hines

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Hines's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Hines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Hines more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Hines

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Hines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Hines. The network helps show where Thomas E. Hines may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas E. Hines

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas E. Hines. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas E. Hines based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas E. Hines. Thomas E. Hines is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Flessner, Michael L., et al.. (2019). Comparison of Diquat, Glufosinate, and Saflufenacil for Desiccation of ‘Dark Red Norland’ Potato. HortTechnology. 29(5). 643–648. 2 indexed citations
2.
Armel, Gregory R., et al.. (2009). Evaluation of Acetolactate Synthase-inhibiting Herbicides for Weed Control in Transplanted Bell Pepper. HortTechnology. 19(2). 400–404.
3.
Armel, Gregory R., et al.. (2009). Evaluation of Acetolactate Synthase-inhibiting Herbicides for Weed Control in Transplanted Bell Pepper. HortTechnology. 19(2). 400–404. 2 indexed citations
4.
Armel, Gregory R., et al.. (2008). Mesotrione Combinations with Atrazine and Bentazon for Yellow and Purple Nutsedge (Cyperus EsculentusandC. Rotundus) Control in Corn. Weed Technology. 22(3). 391–396. 14 indexed citations
5.
Richardson, Robert J., Henry P. Wilson, Gregory R. Armel, & Thomas E. Hines. (2005). Responses of Imidazolinone-Resistant Corn, Several Weeds, and Two Rotational Crops to Trifloxysulfuron. Weed Technology. 19(3). 744–748. 1 indexed citations
6.
Bailey, William A., Henry P. Wilson, & Thomas E. Hines. (2003). Influence of AE F130060 03 Application Timing on Italian Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) Control1. Weed Technology. 17(4). 842–853. 10 indexed citations
7.
Richardson, Robert J., Henry P. Wilson, Gregory R. Armel, & Thomas E. Hines. (2003). Mixtures of CGA 362622 and Bromoxynil for Broadleaf Weed Control in Bromoxynil-Resistant Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)1. Weed Technology. 17(3). 496–502. 17 indexed citations
8.
Poston, Daniel H., Henry P. Wilson, & Thomas E. Hines. (2002). Growth and development of imidazolinone-resistant and -susceptible smooth pigweed biotypes. Weed Science. 50(4). 485–493. 9 indexed citations
9.
Bailey, William A., Henry P. Wilson, & Thomas E. Hines. (2002). Response of Potato (Solanum tuberosum) and Selected Weeds to Sulfentrazone1. Weed Technology. 16(3). 651–658. 21 indexed citations
10.
Wilson, Henry P., et al.. (2002). Management programs and crop rotations influence populations of annual grass weeds and yellow nutsedge. Weed Science. 50(1). 112–119. 14 indexed citations
11.
Bailey, William A., Henry P. Wilson, & Thomas E. Hines. (2001). Influence of Cultivation and Herbicide Programs on Weed Control and Net Returns in Potato (Solanum tuberosum)1. Weed Technology. 15(4). 654–659. 16 indexed citations
12.
Poston, Daniel H., Henry P. Wilson, & Thomas E. Hines. (2000). Imidazolinone resistance in severalAmaranthus hybriduspopulations. Weed Science. 48(4). 508–513. 13 indexed citations
13.
Wilson, Henry P., et al.. (1998). Characterization of Imidazolinone-Resistant Smooth Pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus). Weed Technology. 12(4). 575–584. 19 indexed citations
14.
Wilson, Henry P., et al.. (1997). Rimsulfuron and Metribuzin Efficacy in Transplanted Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Weed Technology. 11(2). 324–328. 12 indexed citations
15.
Wilson, Henry P., et al.. (1996). Efficacy of Rimsulfuron and Metribuzin in Potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technology. 10(3). 475–480. 24 indexed citations
16.
Wilson, Henry P., et al.. (1996). Weed Management Programs in Potato (Solanum tuberosum) with Rimsulfuron. Weed Technology. 10(2). 354–358. 15 indexed citations
17.
Wilson, Henry P., et al.. (1988). Consecutive Annual Applications of Alachlor and Metolachlor to Continuous No-Till Corn (Zea mays). Weed Science. 36(3). 340–344. 15 indexed citations
18.
Bellinder, Robin R., Henry P. Wilson, & Thomas E. Hines. (1987). Comparative Studies of Conventional and No-tillage Systems for Snap Bean Production. HortScience. 22(1). 159–159. 5 indexed citations
19.
Wilson, Henry P., et al.. (1986). Influence of Tillage and Herbicides on Weed Control in a Wheat (Triticum aestivum)–Soybean (Glycine max) Rotation. Weed Science. 34(4). 590–594. 21 indexed citations
20.
Wilson, Henry P. & Thomas E. Hines. (1980). Postemergence control of annual grasses in soybeans.. 6–10. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026