Thomas Dowe

852 total citations
10 papers, 606 citations indexed

About

Thomas Dowe is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Surgery and Animal Science and Zoology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Dowe has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 606 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 2 papers in Surgery and 2 papers in Animal Science and Zoology. Recurrent topics in Thomas Dowe's work include Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (4 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (2 papers) and Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (2 papers). Thomas Dowe is often cited by papers focused on Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (4 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (2 papers) and Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (2 papers). Thomas Dowe collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Thomas Dowe's co-authors include Steffen Böhm, Michelle Lockley, Darren Ennis, Naveena Singh, Asma Faruqi, Amanda Fitzpatrick, Elly Brockbank, Arjun Jeyarajah, Probir Chakravarty and Frances R. Balkwill and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Clinical Cancer Research and Journal of Animal Science.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Dowe

10 papers receiving 595 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas Dowe United Kingdom	6	279	249	206	121	114	10	606
Sandra Kolkman-Uljee Netherlands	10	135 0.5×	183 0.7×	72 0.3×	108 0.9×	105 0.9×	11	570
H Teshima Japan	11	97 0.3×	89 0.4×	39 0.2×	119 1.0×	52 0.5×	49	485
Harrison Gallagher United States	12	130 0.5×	85 0.3×	58 0.3×	83 0.7×	23 0.2×	20	404
U Hasholzner Germany	11	182 0.7×	80 0.3×	46 0.2×	143 1.2×	28 0.2×	22	511
Jacqueline McDermott United Kingdom	11	143 0.5×	158 0.6×	114 0.6×	29 0.2×	80 0.7×	20	370
Thomas K. Lidner United States	8	79 0.3×	56 0.2×	82 0.4×	97 0.8×	41 0.4×	16	426
Sanne Samuels Netherlands	12	309 1.1×	45 0.2×	268 1.3×	73 0.6×	65 0.6×	16	526
Francine Walker‐Combrouze France	9	65 0.2×	194 0.8×	66 0.3×	34 0.3×	37 0.3×	20	445
Shiou‐Fu Lin Taiwan	13	99 0.4×	132 0.5×	37 0.2×	59 0.5×	93 0.8×	26	525

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Dowe

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Dowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Dowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Dowe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Dowe

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Dowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Dowe. The network helps show where Thomas Dowe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Dowe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Dowe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Dowe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Dowe. Thomas Dowe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

Montfort, Anne, Oliver M.T. Pearce, Eleni Maniati, et al.. (2016). A Strong B-cell Response Is Part of the Immune Landscape in Human High-Grade Serous Ovarian Metastases. Clinical Cancer Research. 23(1). 250–262. 172 indexed citations

Böhm, Steffen, Anne Montfort, Oliver M.T. Pearce, et al.. (2016). Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Modulates the Immune Microenvironment in Metastases of Tubo-Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma. Clinical Cancer Research. 22(12). 3025–3036. 111 indexed citations

Böhm, Steffen, Asma Faruqi, Michelle Lockley, et al.. (2015). Chemotherapy Response Score: Development and Validation of a System to Quantify Histopathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Tubo-Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 33(22). 2457–2463. 195 indexed citations

Debernardi, Silvana, Nathalie J. Massat, Tomasz P. Radon, et al.. (2015). Noninvasive urinary miRNA biomarkers for early detection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.. American Journal of Cancer Research. 5(11). 3455–66. 92 indexed citations

Dowe, Thomas, et al.. (1957). The Effects of Adequate and Excessive Calcium When Fed with Adequate Phosphorus in Growing Rations for Beef Calves. Journal of Animal Science. 16(4). 811–820. 18 indexed citations

Dowe, Thomas, et al.. (1957). Evaluation of Ground Corncobs and Corncob Components as Nutritive Materials in Rations for Beef Cattle. Insecta mundi. 2 indexed citations

Dowe, Thomas, et al.. (1955). The Effect of Particle Size on the Utilization of Bone Meal and Limestone by Beef Cattle1. Journal of Animal Science. 14(4). 1042–1049. 2 indexed citations

Dowe, Thomas, et al.. (1955). The Effects of the Corn-Alfalfa Hay Ratio on the Digestibility of the Different Nutrients by Cattle. Journal of Animal Science. 14(2). 340–349. 1 indexed citations

Dowe, Thomas, et al.. (1954). Use of animal fats in rations for beef cattle. Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society. 31(2). 54–55. 4 indexed citations

10.

Dowe, Thomas, et al.. (1954). Effect of Aureomycin in Preventing Liver Abscess in Cattle.. Experimental Biology and Medicine. 85(1). 18–20. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact