Thomas D. Lee

1.8k citations
42 papers · 1.1k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas D. Lee

40 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Thomas D. Lee
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 703
  • Ecological Modeling 78
  • Insect Science 212
  • Global and Planetary Change 303
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 249
Replace Ivar Gjerde with:
Ivar Gjerde Norway
Keiko Kitamura Japan
Sebastian Vogel Germany
François Hébert Canada
Barbara Moser Switzerland
Merav Seifan Israel
Stephen J. Murphy United States
Akihiro Sumida Japan
Timo Domisch Finland
Guoyong Li China
Thomas D. Lee relative to Ivar Gjerde Norway Ivar Gjerde's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ivar Gjerde · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas D. Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas D. Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas D. Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas D. Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas D. Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas D. Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas D. Lee. The network helps show where Thomas D. Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas D. Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas D. Lee Line = papers co-authored together Thomas D. Lee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004118
2 1984105
3 199398
4 201483
5 200070
6 200963
7 200351
8 200350
9 200546
10 200345
11 200645
12 200444
13 200139
14 200833
15 200529
16 200127
17 201925
18 201123
19 200218
20 202213

About Thomas D. Lee

Thomas D. Lee is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change and Insect Science, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (23 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (11 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (10 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (6 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (5 papers), Forest ecology and management (5 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (5 papers) and Plant and animal studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (703 citations), Ecological Modeling (78 citations), Insect Science (212 citations), Global and Planetary Change (303 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (249 citations). Thomas D. Lee has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Robert T. Eckert, Brian Frappier, James J. Worrall, T. C. Harrington, William B. Leak, James P. Barrett, John A. Litvaitis, Serita D. Frey, Mark J. Ducey and Atsuko Seki. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, Ecology and Biological Invasions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact