Thomas C. Prang

483 total citations
20 papers, 290 citations indexed

About

Thomas C. Prang is a scholar working on Paleontology, Social Psychology and Anthropology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas C. Prang has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 290 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Paleontology, 13 papers in Social Psychology and 13 papers in Anthropology. Recurrent topics in Thomas C. Prang's work include Evolution and Paleontology Studies (15 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (13 papers) and Primate Behavior and Ecology (12 papers). Thomas C. Prang is often cited by papers focused on Evolution and Paleontology Studies (15 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (13 papers) and Primate Behavior and Ecology (12 papers). Thomas C. Prang collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Africa. Thomas C. Prang's co-authors include Scott A. Williams, Mark Grabowski, Gabrielle A. Russo, Jeremy M. DeSilva, Corey M. Gill, Zeresenay Alemseged, Miriam A. Bredella, Marc R. Meyer, Daniel L. Gebo and Nathan M. Young and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Scientific Reports and Science Advances.

In The Last Decade

Thomas C. Prang

16 papers receiving 282 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas C. Prang United States 11 178 153 149 60 46 20 290
Kristi Lewton United States 11 134 0.8× 126 0.8× 88 0.6× 119 2.0× 66 1.4× 23 374
Elizabeth H. Harmon United States 7 192 1.1× 166 1.1× 197 1.3× 70 1.2× 51 1.1× 7 323
Habiba Chirchir United States 11 127 0.7× 107 0.7× 130 0.9× 89 1.5× 32 0.7× 22 332
Zewdi J. Tsegai Germany 8 181 1.0× 129 0.8× 144 1.0× 123 2.0× 24 0.5× 16 404
Ameline Bardo United Kingdom 11 187 1.1× 91 0.6× 129 0.9× 79 1.3× 15 0.3× 21 310
Juliet McClymont United Kingdom 12 109 0.6× 141 0.9× 176 1.2× 39 0.7× 40 0.9× 17 382
Michelle S.M. Drapeau Canada 11 216 1.2× 227 1.5× 268 1.8× 100 1.7× 54 1.2× 18 449
Carrie S. Mongle United States 11 90 0.5× 157 1.0× 150 1.0× 55 0.9× 43 0.9× 30 319
Guillaume Daver France 9 160 0.9× 139 0.9× 165 1.1× 32 0.5× 30 0.7× 19 318
Andrew S. Deane United States 13 319 1.8× 269 1.8× 241 1.6× 67 1.1× 81 1.8× 35 593

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas C. Prang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas C. Prang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas C. Prang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas C. Prang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas C. Prang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas C. Prang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas C. Prang. The network helps show where Thomas C. Prang may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas C. Prang

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas C. Prang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas C. Prang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas C. Prang. Thomas C. Prang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Prang, Thomas C., Matthew W. Tocheri, Biren A. Patel, Scott A. Williams, & Caley M. Orr. (2025). Ardipithecus ramidus ankle provides evidence for African ape-like vertical climbing in the earliest hominins. Communications Biology. 8(1). 1454–1454.
2.
Haile‐Selassie, Yohannes, Gary T. Schwartz, Thomas C. Prang, et al.. (2025). New finds shed light on diet and locomotion in Australopithecus deyiremeda. Nature. 648(8094). 640–648.
3.
Williams, Scott A., et al.. (2025). A three-dimensional geometric morphometric study of Miocene ape lumbar vertebrae, with implications for hominoid locomotor evolution. Journal of Human Evolution. 201. 103650–103650.
4.
Russo, Gabrielle A., et al.. (2024). An ape partial postcranial skeleton (KNM-NP 64631) from the Middle Miocene of Napudet, northern Kenya. Journal of Human Evolution. 192. 103519–103519. 3 indexed citations
5.
Williams, Scott A., Thomas C. Prang, Gabrielle A. Russo, Nathan M. Young, & Daniel L. Gebo. (2023). African apes and the evolutionary history of orthogrady and bipedalism. American Journal of Biological Anthropology. 181(S76). 58–80. 19 indexed citations
6.
Prang, Thomas C.. (2023). The relative size of the calcaneal tuber reflects heel strike plantigrady in African apes and humans. American Journal of Biological Anthropology. 183(2). e24865–e24865.
7.
Prang, Thomas C. & Matthew W. Tocheri. (2022). Ecological divergence and calcaneal‐cuboid morphology in gorillas. American Journal of Biological Anthropology. 183(3). 3 indexed citations
8.
Williams, Scott A., et al.. (2022). Inferring lumbar lordosis in Neandertals and other hominins. PNAS Nexus. 1(1). pgab005–pgab005. 5 indexed citations
9.
Williams, Scott A., Thomas C. Prang, Marc R. Meyer, et al.. (2021). New fossils of Australopithecus sediba reveal a nearly complete lower back. Library Open Repository (Universidad Complutense Madrid). 4 indexed citations
10.
Prabhat, Anjali M., et al.. (2021). Homoplasy in the evolution of modern human-like joint proportions in Australopithecus afarensis. eLife. 10. 12 indexed citations
11.
Prang, Thomas C., et al.. (2021). Ardipithecushand provides evidence that humans and chimpanzees evolved from an ancestor with suspensory adaptations. Science Advances. 7(9). 43 indexed citations
12.
Williams, Scott A., Thomas C. Prang, Marc R. Meyer, Gabrielle A. Russo, & Liza J. Shapiro. (2020). Reevaluating bipedalism in Danuvius. Nature. 586(7827). E1–E3. 19 indexed citations
14.
DeSilva, Jeremy M., Corey M. Gill, Thomas C. Prang, Miriam A. Bredella, & Zeresenay Alemseged. (2018). A nearly complete foot from Dikika, Ethiopia and its implications for the ontogeny and function of Australopithecus afarensis. Science Advances. 4(7). eaar7723–eaar7723. 27 indexed citations
15.
Harcourt‐Smith, William E. H., Kimberly A. Congdon, Bernhard Zipfel, et al.. (2016). Homo naledi strides again: preliminary reconstructions of an extinct hominin’s gait. CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa). 159. 314–314. 1 indexed citations
16.
Prang, Thomas C.. (2016). Reevaluating the functional implications of Australopithecus afarensis navicular morphology. Journal of Human Evolution. 97. 73–85. 12 indexed citations
17.
Prang, Thomas C.. (2016). Conarticular congruence of the hominoid subtalar joint complex with implications for joint function in Plio‐Pleistocene hominins. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 160(3). 446–457. 16 indexed citations
18.
Prang, Thomas C.. (2015). Rearfoot posture of Australopithecus sediba and the evolution of the hominin longitudinal arch. Scientific Reports. 5(1). 17677–17677. 26 indexed citations
19.
Prang, Thomas C.. (2015). The subtalar joint complex of Australopithecus sediba. Journal of Human Evolution. 90. 105–119. 33 indexed citations
20.
Prang, Thomas C.. (2014). Calcaneal robusticity in Plio-Pleistocene hominins: Implications for locomotor diversity and phylogeny. Journal of Human Evolution. 80. 135–146. 36 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026