Thomas Brandes

977 citations
29 papers · 574 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Brandes

28 papers receiving 548 citations

Peers

Thomas Brandes
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Developmental Biology 305
  • Signal Processing 152
  • Ecology 243
  • Hardware and Architecture 47
  • Ecological Modeling 29
Replace Richard W. Osborne with:
Richard W. Osborne United States
Li Gao China
Jari Turunen Finland
Per Rasmussen Denmark
Sarah Hallerberg Germany
Ryuji Suzuki Japan
Claire Postlethwaite New Zealand
David W. Krumme United States
Thomas Brandes relative to Richard W. Osborne United States Richard W. Osborne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.7×
Richard W. Osborne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Brandes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Brandes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Brandes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Brandes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Brandes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Brandes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Brandes. The network helps show where Thomas Brandes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Brandes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Brandes Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Brandes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008212
2 201286
3 201178
4 200645
5 200844
6 198814
7 201813
8 200613
9 202111
10 19979
11 20047
12 20207
13 20126
14 20126
15
A Knowledge Based Parallelization Tool in a Programming Environment.
19875
16 20024
17 20202
18 19912
19 20231
20 20091

About Thomas Brandes

Thomas Brandes is a scholar working on Hardware and Architecture, Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence, Oceanography and Developmental Biology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 574 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (11 papers), Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (7 papers), Underwater Acoustics Research (6 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (4 papers), Advanced Data Storage Technologies (3 papers), Interconnection Networks and Systems (3 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (2 papers) and Marine animal studies overview (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (305 citations), Signal Processing (152 citations), Ecology (243 citations), Hardware and Architecture (47 citations) and Ecological Modeling (29 citations). Thomas Brandes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Piotr Naskrecki, Simone Baumann‐Pickering, Melissa S. Soldevilla, Bhavesh Patel, Marie A. Roch, Axel Arnold, Dirk Reith, Torsten Stuehn, Kurt Kremer and Jonathan D. Halverson. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Parallel Computing, Computer Science - Research and Development, Bird Conservation International and IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact