Thomas Bonk

488 citations
12 papers · 392 · h-index 11

Impact in

  • Spectroscopy top 10%
    • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
    • Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
    • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
    • Gene expression and cancer classification
    • Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
    • Gene Regulatory Network Analysis

Papers in

Thomas Bonk

12 papers receiving 374 citations

Peers

Thomas Bonk
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Spectroscopy 74
  • Molecular Biology 209
  • Numerical Analysis 15
  • Cell Biology 37
  • Cancer Research 28
Replace Christina S. Pao with:
Christina S. Pao United States
Julia Poland Germany
Jun Xian United States
Kleitos Sokratous Cyprus
Tatyana Mamonova United States
Timothy G. Curran United States
Jan Tavernier Belgium
Jon P. Butler United States
Thomas Bonk relative to Christina S. Pao United States Christina S. Pao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.4×
Christina S. Pao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Bonk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Bonk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Bonk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Bonk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Bonk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Bonk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Bonk. The network helps show where Thomas Bonk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Bonk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Bonk Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Bonk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 200175
2 201168
3 199941
4 201241
5 200238
6 200325
7 199424
8 200124
9 200022
10 200219
11 201011
12 20024

About Thomas Bonk

Thomas Bonk is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Numerical Analysis, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 392 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (2 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (1 paper), Gene expression and cancer classification (1 paper), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (1 paper), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (1 paper) and Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (74 citations), Molecular Biology (209 citations), Numerical Analysis (15 citations), Cell Biology (37 citations) and Cancer Research (28 citations). Thomas Bonk has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Humeny, Cord‐Michael Becker, Christian Sutter, Johannes F. Gebert, Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz, Ulrich Stephani, Klaus Reuter, Hans Georg Mannherz, Ewald Hannappel and Kristina Becker. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Biochemistry, Nature Biotechnology, The Neuroscientist, Bioinformatics and Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact