Thomas Bonk

486 total citations
10 papers, 276 citations indexed

About

Thomas Bonk is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Bonk has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 276 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Spectroscopy and 2 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Thomas Bonk's work include Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (2 papers). Thomas Bonk is often cited by papers focused on Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (2 papers). Thomas Bonk collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Austria. Thomas Bonk's co-authors include Andreas Humeny, Cord-Michael Becker, Christian Sutter, Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz, Johannes Gebert, Kristina Becker, Thomas Huff, Ewald Hannappel, L. Wildt and Ulrich Stephani and has published in prestigious journals such as Bioinformatics, FEBS Letters and Clinical Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Bonk

10 papers receiving 267 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas Bonk Germany 9 163 71 36 27 24 10 276
Editha Bayer Austria 9 262 1.6× 93 1.3× 42 1.2× 41 1.5× 9 0.4× 10 393
Benjamin D. Stein United States 8 296 1.8× 111 1.6× 39 1.1× 47 1.7× 15 0.6× 10 421
Guoshou Teo Singapore 9 283 1.7× 96 1.4× 53 1.5× 23 0.9× 12 0.5× 9 402
Derek J. Hoelz United States 9 278 1.7× 27 0.4× 45 1.3× 60 2.2× 9 0.4× 15 387
Chia-Feng Tsai Taiwan 8 290 1.8× 137 1.9× 47 1.3× 45 1.7× 7 0.3× 8 388
Jonathan Goya United States 8 388 2.4× 77 1.1× 49 1.4× 22 0.8× 7 0.3× 10 461
Barbara Kaboord United States 8 206 1.3× 70 1.0× 40 1.1× 42 1.6× 6 0.3× 11 308
Tianyao Guo China 10 171 1.0× 42 0.6× 18 0.5× 56 2.1× 17 0.7× 14 280
Jungyuen Choi United States 10 383 2.3× 54 0.8× 18 0.5× 19 0.7× 12 0.5× 11 461
Hans-Christoph Schneider Germany 8 559 3.4× 38 0.5× 58 1.6× 14 0.5× 27 1.1× 8 684

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Bonk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Bonk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Bonk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Bonk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Bonk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Bonk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Bonk. The network helps show where Thomas Bonk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Bonk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Bonk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Bonk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Bonk. Thomas Bonk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Meyer, Pablo, Julia Hoeng, John Jeremy Rice, et al.. (2012). Industrial methodology for process verification in research (IMPROVER): toward systems biology verification. Bioinformatics. 28(9). 1193–1201. 32 indexed citations
2.
Roemer, E., et al.. (2010). The Addition of Cocoa, Glycerol, and Saccharose to the Tobacco of Cigarettes: Implications for Smoke Chemistry, In Vitro Cytotoxicity, Mutagenicity and Further Endpoints. Beiträge zur Tabakforschung international. 24(3). 117–138. 11 indexed citations
4.
Nissum, Mikkel, et al.. (2002). High-throughput genetic screening using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. Psychiatric Genetics. 12(2). 109–117. 3 indexed citations
5.
Bonk, Thomas, Andreas Humeny, Christian Sutter, et al.. (2002). Molecular diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP): genotyping of adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) alleles by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Clinical Biochemistry. 35(2). 87–92. 17 indexed citations
6.
Humeny, Andreas, Thomas Bonk, Kristina Becker, et al.. (2002). A novel recessive hyperekplexia allele GLRA1 (S231R): genotyping by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and functional characterisation as a determinant of cellular glycine receptor trafficking. European Journal of Human Genetics. 10(3). 188–196. 36 indexed citations
7.
Humeny, Andreas, et al.. (2001). Genotyping of thrombotic risk factors by maldi-tof mass spectrometry. Clinical Biochemistry. 34(7). 531–536. 23 indexed citations
8.
Bonk, Thomas & Andreas Humeny. (2001). MALDI-TOF-MS Analysis of Protein and DNA. The Neuroscientist. 7(1). 6–12. 67 indexed citations
9.
Schiebel, K., Andreas Rump, André Rosenthal, et al.. (2000). Elevated DNA sequence diversity in the genomic region of the phosphatase PPP2R3L gene in the human pseudoautosomal region. Cytogenetic and Genome Research. 91(1-4). 224–230. 22 indexed citations
10.
Huff, Thomas, Andreas Humeny, Thomas Bonk, et al.. (1999). Thymosin β4 serves as a glutaminyl substrate of transglutaminase. Labeling with fluorescent dansylcadaverine does not abolish interaction with G‐actin1. FEBS Letters. 464(1-2). 14–20. 41 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026