Thomas B. Hugh

2.2k total citations
76 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Thomas B. Hugh is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Pharmacy. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas B. Hugh has authored 76 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 42 papers in Surgery, 31 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 9 papers in Pharmacy. Recurrent topics in Thomas B. Hugh's work include Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (15 papers), Biliary and Gastrointestinal Fistulas (12 papers) and Esophageal and GI Pathology (12 papers). Thomas B. Hugh is often cited by papers focused on Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (15 papers), Biliary and Gastrointestinal Fistulas (12 papers) and Esophageal and GI Pathology (12 papers). Thomas B. Hugh collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Thomas B. Hugh's co-authors include Harold Ellis, Michael D. Kelly, Sidney Dekker, Anthony J. Dodds, J. C. Biggs, Andrew V. Biankin, Adrienne Morey, Sandra A. Biankin, James G. Kench and Michael D. Kelly and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Gut and British journal of surgery.

In The Last Decade

Thomas B. Hugh

71 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas B. Hugh Australia	18	937	579	411	146	119	76	1.5k
A. J. Shorthouse United Kingdom	28	1.2k 1.3×	551 1.0×	1.1k 2.6×	204 1.4×	180 1.5×	81	2.3k
Richard Cohen United Kingdom	22	1.0k 1.1×	638 1.1×	436 1.1×	159 1.1×	71 0.6×	46	2.1k
Claude H. Organ United States	22	1.3k 1.3×	461 0.8×	245 0.6×	42 0.3×	53 0.4×	83	1.8k
J. Patrick O’Leary United States	20	752 0.8×	210 0.4×	149 0.4×	103 0.7×	82 0.7×	78	1.4k
Jaques Waisberg Brazil	19	588 0.6×	399 0.7×	403 1.0×	259 1.8×	73 0.6×	155	1.5k
Sven Adamsen Denmark	22	1.1k 1.2×	681 1.2×	417 1.0×	54 0.4×	197 1.7×	69	1.5k
R. D. Spicer United Kingdom	24	852 0.9×	740 1.3×	127 0.3×	219 1.5×	97 0.8×	76	1.6k
Ronald K. Tompkins United States	28	2.2k 2.4×	1.3k 2.2×	1.0k 2.5×	102 0.7×	196 1.6×	95	3.0k
Clancy J. Clark United States	22	976 1.0×	393 0.7×	679 1.7×	78 0.5×	65 0.5×	90	1.6k
Jensen T. C. Poon Hong Kong	25	1.0k 1.1×	469 0.8×	1.3k 3.2×	229 1.6×	112 0.9×	44	2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas B. Hugh

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas B. Hugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas B. Hugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas B. Hugh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas B. Hugh

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas B. Hugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas B. Hugh. The network helps show where Thomas B. Hugh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas B. Hugh

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas B. Hugh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas B. Hugh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas B. Hugh. Thomas B. Hugh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Connor, Saxon, William Perry, L. Nathanson, Thomas B. Hugh, & Thomas J. Hugh. (2013). Using a standardized method for laparoscopic cholecystectomy to create a concept operation-specific checklist. HPB. 16(5). 422–429. 47 indexed citations

Hugh, Thomas B.. (2010). Re: Chappel v Hart: res judicata?. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 80(7-8). 576–576.

Fletcher, John & Thomas B. Hugh. (2009). Managing The Risk Of Perioperative Thromboembolism. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 79(7-8). 544–547.

Hugh, Thomas B., et al.. (2009). Getting surgery right is more complex than it appears: A new look is needed at aberrant procedures. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 79(7-8). 548–553. 2 indexed citations

Dekker, Sidney & Thomas B. Hugh. (2008). LAPAROSCOPIC BILE DUCT INJURY: UNDERSTANDING THE PSYCHOLOGY AND HEURISTICS OF THE ERROR. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 78(12). 1109–1114. 37 indexed citations

Talbot, Michael, Thomas B. Hugh, & Phillip Spratt. (2007). GASTRIC ANTRAL PATCH OESOPHAGOPLASTY FOR IATROGENIC TRACHEO‐OESOPHAGEAL FISTULA. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 77(4). 295–297. 5 indexed citations

Hugh, Thomas B.. (2005). The Liverpool Hospital Survival Guide to Drains and Tubes.. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 75(12). 1040–1040. 1 indexed citations

Hugh, Thomas B., et al.. (2000). LAPAROSCOPIC INTRAPERITONEAL FOREIGN BODY FROM ADHESIVE DRAPES. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery. 70(7). 525–525. 5 indexed citations

Hugh, Thomas B. & Michael D. Kelly. (1999). Corrosive ingestion and the surgeon11No competing interests declared.. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 189(5). 508–522. 54 indexed citations

10.

Hugh, Thomas B., et al.. (1997). Rouvière's sulcus: A useful landmark in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. British journal of surgery. 84(9). 1253–1254. 69 indexed citations

11.

Hugh, Thomas B., et al.. (1996). INFLAMMATORY PSEUDOTUMOUR OF THE SPLEEN. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery. 66(7). 492–493. 17 indexed citations

12.

Hugh, Thomas B.. (1995). THE BEGINNING OF ANTISEPTIC SURGERY IN AUSTRALIA. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery. 65(12). 887–889. 3 indexed citations

13.

Hugh, Thomas B., et al.. (1993). Withdrawal and Expulsion in Germany: A Comparative Perspective on the "Close Corporation Problem". Michigan Journal of International Law. 15(1). 127–188. 2 indexed citations

14.

Hugh, Thomas B., et al.. (1990). Is closure of the peritoneal layer necessary in the repair of midline surgical abdominal wounds?. World Journal of Surgery. 14(2). 231–233. 40 indexed citations

15.

Carrick, Joan, Bruce D. Doust, M Coleman, et al.. (1987). METHYL TERTIARY BUTYL ETHER CHOLELITHOLYSIS OF CALCULI IN THE GALLBLADDER AND BILE DUCTS*. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine. 17(4). 435–440. 6 indexed citations

16.

Hugh, Thomas B., et al.. (1984). Epidemiology of peptic ulcer in Australia. A study based on government statistics in four states.. PubMed. 141(2). 81–5. 15 indexed citations

17.

Hugh, Thomas B., Robert J. Lusby, & M Coleman. (1979). Antral patch esophagoplasty. The American Journal of Surgery. 137(2). 221–225. 13 indexed citations

18.

Hugh, Thomas B., Robert J. Lusby, & M Coleman. (1979). Gastric patch esophagoplasty: An experimental study. The American Journal of Surgery. 137(2). 226–227. 5 indexed citations

19.

Biggs, J. C., Thomas B. Hugh, & Anthony J. Dodds. (1976). Tranexamic acid and upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage--a double-blind trial.. Gut. 17(9). 729–734. 86 indexed citations

20.

Hugh, Thomas B. & Harold Ellis. (1964). Postoperative abdominal adhesions. An experimental study of the value of polyvinylpyrrolidone in prophylaxis. British journal of surgery. 51(5). 381–382. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact