Therese C. Walden

415 total citations
9 papers, 327 citations indexed

About

Therese C. Walden is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Speech and Hearing and Sensory Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Therese C. Walden has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 327 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 5 papers in Speech and Hearing and 3 papers in Sensory Systems. Recurrent topics in Therese C. Walden's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (7 papers), Noise Effects and Management (5 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (3 papers). Therese C. Walden is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (7 papers), Noise Effects and Management (5 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (3 papers). Therese C. Walden collaborates with scholars based in United States. Therese C. Walden's co-authors include Brian E. Walden, Ken W. Grant, Daniel McDermott, Stephen A. Fausti, Anna C. Diedesch, Marjorie R. Leek, Robert L. Folmer, Frederick J. Gallun, Martyn Lewis and M. Samantha Lewis and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, International Journal of Audiology and Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

In The Last Decade

Therese C. Walden

9 papers receiving 319 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Therese C. Walden United States 6 260 175 175 68 33 9 327
Anna C. Diedesch United States 8 298 1.1× 207 1.2× 167 1.0× 70 1.0× 48 1.5× 25 370
Emmanuèle Ambert-Dahan France 11 320 1.2× 120 0.7× 184 1.1× 42 0.6× 51 1.5× 22 385
Robert C. Fifer United States 12 364 1.4× 131 0.7× 255 1.5× 31 0.5× 17 0.5× 27 490
Eric C. Hoover United States 7 221 0.8× 150 0.9× 118 0.7× 30 0.4× 32 1.0× 27 241
Holly Hosford‐Dunn United States 11 284 1.1× 126 0.7× 168 1.0× 73 1.1× 24 0.7× 18 423
Amy P. Olund United States 9 312 1.2× 179 1.0× 221 1.3× 16 0.2× 59 1.8× 13 352
Meredith A. Rooth United States 15 471 1.8× 262 1.5× 389 2.2× 41 0.6× 51 1.5× 25 535
Luise Wagner Germany 9 144 0.6× 61 0.3× 60 0.3× 44 0.6× 32 1.0× 27 277
Marc A. Fagelson United States 12 244 0.9× 75 0.4× 241 1.4× 19 0.3× 9 0.3× 27 338
Rebecca Venediktov United States 8 184 0.7× 210 1.2× 137 0.8× 11 0.2× 41 1.2× 11 406

Countries citing papers authored by Therese C. Walden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Therese C. Walden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Therese C. Walden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Therese C. Walden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Therese C. Walden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Therese C. Walden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Therese C. Walden. The network helps show where Therese C. Walden may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Therese C. Walden

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Therese C. Walden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Therese C. Walden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Therese C. Walden. Therese C. Walden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Cohen, Julie, Mary T. Cord, Therese C. Walden, et al.. (2015). Benefits of Nonlinear Frequency Compression in Adult Hearing Aid Users. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 26(10). 838–855. 10 indexed citations
2.
Grant, Ken W. & Therese C. Walden. (2013). Understanding Excessive SNR Loss in Hearing-Impaired Listeners. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 24(4). 258–273. 34 indexed citations
3.
Gallun, Frederick J., M. Samantha Lewis, Robert L. Folmer, et al.. (2012). Implications of blast exposure for central auditory function: A review. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 49(7). 1059–1059. 60 indexed citations
4.
Gallun, Frederick J., Anna C. Diedesch, Therese C. Walden, et al.. (2012). Performance on tests of central auditory processing by individuals exposed to high-intensity blasts. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 49(7). 1005–1005. 98 indexed citations
5.
Walden, Therese C., Brian E. Walden, Van Summers, & Ken W. Grant. (2009). A Naturalistic Approach to Assessing Hearing Aid Candidacy and Motivating Hearing Aid Use. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 20(10). 607–620. 5 indexed citations
6.
Walden, Therese C.. (2006). Clinical benefits and risks of bilateral amplification. International Journal of Audiology. 45(sup1). 49–52. 3 indexed citations
7.
Walden, Therese C. & Brian E. Walden. (2005). Unilateral versus Bilateral Amplification for Adults with Impaired Hearing. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 16(8). 574–584. 55 indexed citations
8.
Walden, Therese C. & Brian E. Walden. (2004). Predicting Success with Hearing Aids in Everyday Living. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 15(5). 342–352. 60 indexed citations
9.
Walden, Therese C., Brian E. Walden, & Mary T. Cord. (2002). Performance of Custom-Fit versus Fixed-Format Hearing Aids for Precipitously Sloping High-Frequency Hearing Loss. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 13(7). 356–366. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026