Theo Senden

428 total citations
9 papers, 317 citations indexed

About

Theo Senden is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Theo Senden has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 317 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in General Health Professions, 3 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 3 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Theo Senden's work include Workplace Health and Well-being (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers) and Occupational health in dentistry (2 papers). Theo Senden is often cited by papers focused on Workplace Health and Well-being (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers) and Occupational health in dentistry (2 papers). Theo Senden collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Taiwan. Theo Senden's co-authors include Josephine Engels, J.W.J. van der Gulden, R. A. Binkhorst, Jaap den Hartogh, Rosella Hermens, Nicole M. A. Blijlevens, Eline van Dulmen‐den Broeder, Judith B. Prins, Koos van der Velden and Jacqueline J. Loonen and has published in prestigious journals such as Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine and European Journal of Public Health.

In The Last Decade

Theo Senden

7 papers receiving 293 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Theo Senden Netherlands	4	214	116	102	91	55	9	317
Patience Erick Botswana	8	211 1.0×	96 0.8×	147 1.4×	57 0.6×	144 2.6×	16	370
Maryann H. Long Australia	7	211 1.0×	120 1.0×	85 0.8×	110 1.2×	48 0.9×	11	304
M. H. W. Frings-Dresen Netherlands	9	93 0.4×	16 0.1×	54 0.5×	86 0.9×	22 0.4×	27	373
Helena Loureiro Portugal	8	117 0.5×	73 0.6×	53 0.5×	74 0.8×	62 1.1×	33	337
Gerlienke E. Voerman Netherlands	10	119 0.6×	38 0.3×	59 0.6×	119 1.3×	7 0.1×	12	342
Leigh Hendrie Australia	7	121 0.6×	30 0.3×	27 0.3×	58 0.6×	54 1.0×	9	355
Agneta Isacsson Sweden	9	180 0.8×	50 0.4×	62 0.6×	128 1.4×	34 0.6×	9	362
Margaret O Best Australia	8	427 2.0×	234 2.0×	115 1.1×	73 0.8×	121 2.2×	11	523
Nicole Majery Belgium	4	80 0.4×	14 0.1×	35 0.3×	191 2.1×	17 0.3×	6	292
Jeffrey Dussetschleger United States	9	177 0.8×	147 1.3×	81 0.8×	111 1.2×	31 0.6×	14	318

Countries citing papers authored by Theo Senden

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Theo Senden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Theo Senden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theo Senden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Theo Senden

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Theo Senden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Theo Senden. The network helps show where Theo Senden may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Theo Senden

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Theo Senden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Theo Senden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Theo Senden. Theo Senden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Senden, Theo, et al.. (2025). Bridging the gap: Work as a treatment goal in healthcare. An innovative approach at Radboudumc. Work. 81(2). 2593–2597. 1 indexed citations

Peters, Marlies, et al.. (2024). Including ‘Work as a Treatment Goal’ in the Care for Patients with Chronic Diseases. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 35(2). 411–422. 1 indexed citations

Boonen, Annelies, et al.. (2022). Work-related support in clinical care for patients with a chronic disease: development of an intervention. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 32(4). 705–717. 6 indexed citations

Peters, Marlies, et al.. (2021). Work-related support in clinical care for patients with chronic diseases: intervention development. European Journal of Public Health. 31(Supplement_3). 2 indexed citations

Loenhout, Joris Adriaan Frank van, Theo Senden, Stephan P. Keijmel, et al.. (2020). Impact of Q-fever fatigue syndrome on patients’ work status. Occupational Medicine. 70(8). 578–585. 1 indexed citations

Loonen, Jacqueline J., Nicole M. A. Blijlevens, Judith B. Prins, et al.. (2018). Cancer Survivorship Care: Person Centered Care in a Multidisciplinary Shared Care Model. International Journal of Integrated Care. 18(1). 4–4. 54 indexed citations

Hulshof, Carel, et al.. (2015). Die Furcht ist die Mutter der Moral (Nietzsche). Tijdschrift voor bedrijfs- en verzekeringsgeneeskunde. 23(2). 53–54.

Engels, Josephine, et al.. (1996). Work related risk factors for musculoskeletal complaints in the nursing profession: results of a questionnaire survey.. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 53(9). 636–641. 201 indexed citations

Engels, Josephine, et al.. (1994). Physical Work Load and Its Assessment among the Nursing Staff in Nursing Homes. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 36(3). 338–345. 51 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact