Thea Lousen

429 total citations
9 papers, 342 citations indexed

About

Thea Lousen is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Thea Lousen has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 342 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 4 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 2 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Thea Lousen's work include Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (3 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (3 papers) and Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (3 papers). Thea Lousen is often cited by papers focused on Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (3 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (3 papers) and Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (3 papers). Thea Lousen collaborates with scholars based in Denmark, Sweden and Germany. Thea Lousen's co-authors include Ole Rasmussen, Jens J. Holst, Claus Thomsen, Jürgen Schrezenmeir, S. Fenselau, Kjeld Hermansen, Joachim G. Klebe, Finn Friis Lauszus, Charlotte Wilken‐Jensen and P. Lassen and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology and Transfusion.

In The Last Decade

Thea Lousen

9 papers receiving 329 citations

Peers

Thea Lousen

EDM

PHYSI

ND

PHEOH

OG

M. Elizabeth Tejero United States

Tatiane Aparecida Ribeiro Brazil

Ingrid Løvold Mostad Norway

M. Noakes Australia

Aziz Aksoy Türkiye

Lydia Gil Huerta Spain

L. A. Barriocanal United Kingdom

Yohei Kitamura Japan

Anize Delfino von Frankenberg Brazil

Julianne Filion United States

M. Elizabeth Tejero United States

Thea Lousen

106 ×0.7

EDM

162 ×1.4

PHYSI

180 ×1.7

ND

91 ×1.6

PHEOH

16 ×0.3

OG

Citations per year, relative to Thea Lousen Thea Lousen (= 1×) peers M. Elizabeth Tejero

Countries citing papers authored by Thea Lousen

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thea Lousen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thea Lousen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thea Lousen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thea Lousen

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thea Lousen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thea Lousen. The network helps show where Thea Lousen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thea Lousen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thea Lousen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thea Lousen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thea Lousen. Thea Lousen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Jensen, Arne, Thea Lousen, Puk Sandager, et al.. (2023). Prenatal detection of orofacial clefts in Denmark from 2009 to 2018. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 63(4). 507–513. 6 indexed citations

2.

Rudnicki, Martin, et al.. (2015). Impact of adding a second layer to a single unlocked closure of a Cesarean uterine incision: randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 47(4). 417–422. 27 indexed citations

3.

Lauszus, Finn Friis, et al.. (2013). Ambulatory arterial stiffness index in type 1 diabetes mellitus: any different during pregnancy?. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 169(2). 234–238. 1 indexed citations

4.

Lauszus, Finn Friis, et al.. (2008). Night/day ratio as predictor of preeclampsia in normoalbuminuric, diabetic women: early signs of blood pressure disorders. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 279(6). 829–834. 5 indexed citations

5.

Larsen, Rune, Thea Lousen, Morten Hedegaard, et al.. (2008). Massive fetomaternal hemorrhage: clearance of fetal red blood cells after intravenous anti‐D prophylaxis monitored by flow cytometry. Transfusion. 48(8). 1707–1712. 3 indexed citations

6.

Lauszus, Finn Friis, et al.. (2007). Precision, consistency, and reproducibility of blood pressure in diabetic and non‐diabetic pregnancy: the appraisal of repeated measurements. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 86(9). 1063–1070. 7 indexed citations

7.

Lauszus, Finn Friis, et al.. (2001). Ambulatory blood pressure as predictor of preeclampsia in diabetic pregnancies with respect to urinary albumin excretion rate and glycemic regulation. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 80(12). 1096–1103. 23 indexed citations

8.

Lauszus, Finn Friis, et al.. (2001). Ambulatory blood pressure as predictor of preeclampsia in diabetic pregnancies with respect to urinary albumin excretion rate and glycemic regulation. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 80(12). 1096–1103. 1 indexed citations

9.

Thomsen, Claus, Ole Rasmussen, Thea Lousen, et al.. (1999). Differential effects of saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids on postprandial lipemia and incretin responses in healthy subjects. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 69(6). 1135–1143. 269 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact