Tess Dance

1.3k total citations
43 papers, 898 citations indexed

About

Tess Dance is a scholar working on Environmental Engineering, Geophysics and Mechanical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Tess Dance has authored 43 papers receiving a total of 898 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 35 papers in Environmental Engineering, 21 papers in Geophysics and 19 papers in Mechanical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Tess Dance's work include CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions (35 papers), Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques (20 papers) and Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (17 papers). Tess Dance is often cited by papers focused on CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions (35 papers), Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques (20 papers) and Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (17 papers). Tess Dance collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Tess Dance's co-authors include Jonathan Ennis‐King, Barry Freifeld, Roman Pevzner, Linda Stalker, Chris Boreham, Dirk Kirste, Lincoln Paterson, Boris Gurevich, Charles Jenkins and Jim Underschultz and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Geophysics and Marine and Petroleum Geology.

In The Last Decade

Tess Dance

42 papers receiving 873 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tess Dance Australia 16 667 358 335 333 190 43 898
Allan Mathieson Norway 8 564 0.8× 344 1.0× 185 0.6× 201 0.6× 185 1.0× 12 689
Olav Hansen Norway 8 414 0.6× 300 0.8× 172 0.5× 181 0.5× 119 0.6× 13 598
Marc Lescanne France 17 324 0.5× 188 0.5× 125 0.4× 144 0.4× 159 0.8× 35 603
Mark H. Holtz United States 11 583 0.9× 354 1.0× 116 0.3× 393 1.2× 228 1.2× 36 805
Iain Wright Norway 7 501 0.8× 307 0.9× 136 0.4× 177 0.5× 138 0.7× 14 612
Håvard Alnes Norway 8 292 0.4× 180 0.5× 272 0.8× 197 0.6× 61 0.3× 16 543
K DUROCHER Canada 8 302 0.5× 122 0.3× 119 0.4× 109 0.3× 164 0.9× 9 436
Hannes E. Leetaru United States 13 292 0.4× 161 0.4× 220 0.7× 116 0.3× 125 0.7× 53 489
Ludmila Adam New Zealand 15 193 0.3× 260 0.7× 754 2.3× 379 1.1× 269 1.4× 60 987
Günter Borm Germany 6 291 0.4× 221 0.6× 619 1.8× 148 0.4× 109 0.6× 8 906

Countries citing papers authored by Tess Dance

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tess Dance's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tess Dance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tess Dance more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tess Dance

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tess Dance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tess Dance. The network helps show where Tess Dance may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tess Dance

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tess Dance. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tess Dance based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tess Dance. Tess Dance is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jackson, Samuel J., James Gunning, Jonathan Ennis‐King, Tess Dance, & Charles Jenkins. (2025). Towards industrial deployment of pressure tomography for CO2 storage monitoring: Uncertainty and megatonne scale-up. International journal of greenhouse gas control. 141. 104299–104299. 1 indexed citations
2.
Jackson, Samuel J., James Gunning, Jonathan Ennis‐King, et al.. (2024). Tracking a subsurface CO 2 plume with time-lapse pressure tomography in the Otway Stage 3 field project. International journal of greenhouse gas control. 133. 104099–104099. 5 indexed citations
3.
Jackson, Samuel J., et al.. (2021). Baseline monitoring for time-lapse pressure tomography: Initial results from Otway Stage 3. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
5.
Jenkins, Charles, Julia Correa, Tess Dance, et al.. (2021). Drilling an Array of Monitoring Wells for a CCS Experiment: Lessons From Otway Stage 3. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations
6.
Pevzner, Roman, et al.. (2020). Technical de-risking of a demonstration CCUS project for final investment decision in Australia. The APPEA Journal. 60(1). 282–295. 6 indexed citations
7.
Emelyanova, Irina, et al.. (2020). Detecting Specifi c Facies in Well-Log Data Sets Using Knowledge-Driven Hierarchical Clustering. Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description. 61(4). 383–400. 1 indexed citations
8.
LaForce, Tara, Tess Dance, Jonathan Ennis‐King, Lincoln Paterson, & Yildiray Cinar. (2019). How Good is Good Enough in CO2 Storage Modelling? Looking Back Over Three Generations of Models for the Otway Stage 2C Project. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
9.
Watson, Max, Roman Pevzner, Tess Dance, et al.. (2019). The Otway Stage 2c Project – End to End Co2 Storage in a Saline Formation, Comprising Characterisation, Injection and Monitoring. SSRN Electronic Journal. 6 indexed citations
10.
Dance, Tess, et al.. (2019). Interpreting CO2 Saturation Changes from Pulsed Neutron Logs at the Aquistore Site. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
11.
Michael, Karsten, Ludovic Ricard, Julian Strand, et al.. (2019). The South West Hub In-Situ Laboratory – A Facility for CO2 Injection Testing and Monitoring in a Fault Zone. SSRN Electronic Journal. 8 indexed citations
12.
Pevzner, Roman, et al.. (2018). Rock-physics based time-lapse inversion in Delivery4D: synthetic feasibility study for CO2CRC Otway Project. ASEG Extended Abstracts. 2018(1). 1–4. 1 indexed citations
13.
Jenkins, Charles, Stephen W. Marshall, Tess Dance, et al.. (2017). Validating Subsurface Monitoring as an Alternative Option to Surface M&V - The CO2CRC's Otway Stage 3 Injection. Energy Procedia. 114. 3374–3384. 20 indexed citations
14.
Caspari, Eva, Roman Pevzner, Boris Gurevich, et al.. (2015). Feasibility of CO2 plume detection using 4D seismic: CO2CRC Otway Project case study — Part 1: Rock-physics modeling. Geophysics. 80(4). B95–B104. 22 indexed citations
15.
Pevzner, Roman, Eva Caspari, Boris Gurevich, Tess Dance, & Yildiray Cinar. (2015). Feasibility of CO2 plume detection using 4D seismic: CO2CRC Otway Project case study — Part 2: Detectability analysis. Geophysics. 80(4). B105–B114. 13 indexed citations
17.
Lebedev, Maxim, et al.. (2013). An experimental study of acoustic responses on the injection of supercritical CO2 into sandstones from the Otway Basin. Geophysics. 78(4). D293–D306. 37 indexed citations
18.
Lawrence, Mark J. F., et al.. (2012). Multi-scale characterisation of the Paaratte Formation, Otway Basin, for CO2 injection and storage. The APPEA Journal. 52(2). 664–664. 5 indexed citations
19.
Zhang, Yingqi, Barry Freifeld, Stefan Finsterle, et al.. (2010). Single-well experimental design for studying residual trapping of supercritical carbon dioxide. International journal of greenhouse gas control. 5(1). 88–98. 52 indexed citations
20.
Underschultz, Jim, et al.. (2008). Regional study on potential CO2 geosequestration in the Collie Basin and the Southern Perth Basin of Western Australia. Marine and Petroleum Geology. 26(7). 1255–1273. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026