Ted Jones

629 total citations
12 papers, 444 citations indexed

About

Ted Jones is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Ted Jones has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 444 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Pharmacology, 8 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Ted Jones's work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (11 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (7 papers) and Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (7 papers). Ted Jones is often cited by papers focused on Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (11 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (7 papers) and Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (7 papers). Ted Jones collaborates with scholars based in United States. Ted Jones's co-authors include Todd Moore, Steven D. Passik, Todd M. Moore, Samantha J. Lookatch, Patricia Grant, Diana Meske, David Levine and Gregory W. Heath and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Pain and Clinical Journal of Pain.

In The Last Decade

Ted Jones

11 papers receiving 413 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ted Jones United States 9 253 227 133 133 61 12 444
Linda Roberts United States 6 79 0.3× 90 0.4× 25 0.2× 127 1.0× 31 0.5× 12 313
Richard L. Stieg United States 11 295 1.2× 270 1.2× 277 2.1× 117 0.9× 78 1.3× 19 626
Kok Eng Khor Australia 8 104 0.4× 87 0.4× 195 1.5× 84 0.6× 38 0.6× 15 386
Elspeth E. Shipton New Zealand 7 159 0.6× 100 0.4× 89 0.7× 76 0.6× 58 1.0× 10 397
Rajat N. Moman United States 10 62 0.2× 68 0.3× 110 0.8× 28 0.2× 39 0.6× 25 340
Jacqueline Gardner‐Nix Canada 9 145 0.6× 173 0.8× 161 1.2× 69 0.5× 89 1.5× 11 410
Mark Pasanen United States 7 172 0.7× 127 0.6× 115 0.9× 75 0.6× 42 0.7× 9 395
Phoon Ping Chen Hong Kong 8 95 0.4× 56 0.2× 80 0.6× 31 0.2× 115 1.9× 12 362
Mary Houghton United States 10 109 0.4× 113 0.5× 104 0.8× 98 0.7× 142 2.3× 13 390
Belinda Kipping Australia 4 35 0.1× 24 0.1× 34 0.3× 217 1.6× 52 0.9× 6 355

Countries citing papers authored by Ted Jones

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ted Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ted Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ted Jones more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ted Jones

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ted Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ted Jones. The network helps show where Ted Jones may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ted Jones

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ted Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ted Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ted Jones. Ted Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Jones, Ted, Todd M. Moore, Diana Meske, & Steven D. Passik. (2023). Preliminary validation of the Diversion Risk Scale (DRS): Using environmental and individual factors to predict opioid-related diversion events. Journal of Opioid Management. 19(1). 35–42. 1 indexed citations
2.
Jones, Ted. (2021). A Pilot Study of At-Home Virtual Reality for Chronic Pain Patients. Medical Research Archives. 9(5). 1 indexed citations
3.
Levine, David, et al.. (2019). Breaking the Pain Cycle: A Comprehensive Multidisciplinary Approach to Chronic Pain Management. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 73(4_Supplement_1). 7311520413p1–7311520413p1.
4.
Jones, Ted, et al.. (2018). A Pilot Study of the Impact of Repeated Sessions of Virtual Reality on Chronic Neuropathic Pain. International Journal of Virtual Reality. 18(1). 19–34. 11 indexed citations
5.
Jones, Ted, et al.. (2016). The Impact of Virtual Reality on Chronic Pain. PLoS ONE. 11(12). e0167523–e0167523. 161 indexed citations
6.
Jones, Ted, et al.. (2016). (512) The impact of virtual reality on chronic pain. Journal of Pain. 17(4). S102–S103. 11 indexed citations
7.
Jones, Ted, Samantha J. Lookatch, & Todd Moore. (2015). Validation of a new risk assessment tool: The Brief Risk Questionnaire. Journal of Opioid Management. 11(2). 171–183. 27 indexed citations
8.
Jones, Ted, et al.. (2014). Further validation of an opioid risk assessment tool: The Brief Risk Interview. Journal of Opioid Management. 10(5). 353–364. 26 indexed citations
9.
Jones, Ted & Todd Moore. (2013). Preliminary data on a new opioid risk assessment measure: The Brief Risk Interview. Journal of Opioid Management. 9(1). 19–27. 26 indexed citations
10.
Jones, Ted, et al.. (2011). A Comparison of Various Risk Screening Methods in Predicting Discharge From Opioid Treatment. Clinical Journal of Pain. 28(2). 93–100. 52 indexed citations
11.
Jones, Ted & Steven D. Passik. (2011). A comparison of methods of administering the Opioid Risk Tool. Journal of Opioid Management. 7(5). 347–351. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026