Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Enabling technology for knowledge sharing
1991780 citationsRobert Neches, Richard Fikes et al.AI Magazineprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Ted E. Senator
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Ted E. Senator's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ted E. Senator with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ted E. Senator more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ted E. Senator. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ted E. Senator. The network helps show where Ted E. Senator may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ted E. Senator
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ted E. Senator.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ted E. Senator based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ted E. Senator. Ted E. Senator is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Holder, Lawrence B., et al.. (2025). Introduction to open-world AI. Artificial Intelligence. 347. 104393–104393.1 indexed citations
2.
Goldberg, Henry G., et al.. (2017). Insider Threat Detection in PRODIGAL. Proceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.14 indexed citations
Ghani, Rayid, Ted E. Senator, Paul S. Bradley, et al.. (2013). Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining.1 indexed citations
Getoor, Lise, Ted E. Senator, Pedro Domingos, & Christos Faloutsos. (2003). Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.341 indexed citations
13.
Senator, Ted E. & Henry G. Goldberg. (2002). Industry: break detection systems. Oxford University Press eBooks. 863–873.
Senator, Ted E., et al.. (1995). The FinCEN Artificial Intelligence System: Identifying Potential Money Laundering from Reports of Large Cash Transactions.. Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 156–170.38 indexed citations
18.
Goldberg, Henry G. & Ted E. Senator. (1995). Restructuring Databases for knowledge discovery by consolidation and link formation. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 136–141.50 indexed citations
19.
Neches, Robert, Richard Fikes, Tim Finin, et al.. (1991). Enabling technology for knowledge sharing. AI Magazine. 12(3). 36–56.780 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Senator, Ted E., et al.. (1989). Naval Battle Management Decision Aiding.. Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.