Tebbe Sluis
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Surgery
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Henk J. StamL.H.V. van der WoudeJanneke A. HaismaM P BergenJohannes B. J. BussmannRita J. G. van den Berg-EmonsSonja de GrootAnnet J. Dallmeijer
- Topics
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (6 papers)Spinal Cord Injury Research (6 papers)Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (4 papers)
- Journals
- European Journal of CancerArchives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationCancer Treatment Reviews
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsSwitzerlandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Tebbe Sluis
12 papers receiving 456 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 359
- Psychiatry and Mental health 203
- Rehabilitation 155
- Surgery 97
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 59
Countries citing papers authored by Tebbe Sluis
This map shows the geographic impact of Tebbe Sluis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tebbe Sluis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tebbe Sluis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tebbe Sluis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tebbe Sluis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tebbe Sluis. The network helps show where Tebbe Sluis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tebbe Sluis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tebbe Sluis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tebbe Sluis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tebbe Sluis. Tebbe Sluis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23 | |
| 2 | 51 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 46 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 63 | |
| 9 | [Decubitus ulcers in spinal cord lesion: proactive inspection]. | 1 |
| 10 | 161 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 79 |
About Tebbe Sluis
Tebbe Sluis is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 470 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (6 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (6 papers) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (155 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (359 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (203 citations). Tebbe Sluis has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Henk J. Stam, L.H.V. van der Woude, Janneke A. Haisma, M P Bergen, Johannes B. J. Bussmann, Rita J. G. van den Berg-Emons, Sonja de Groot, Annet J. Dallmeijer, Marcel W. M. Post and L. Valent. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Cancer, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Cancer Treatment Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.