Tea Temim

2.7k total citations
42 papers, 635 citations indexed

About

Tea Temim is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Instrumentation. According to data from OpenAlex, Tea Temim has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 635 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 41 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 30 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 3 papers in Instrumentation. Recurrent topics in Tea Temim's work include Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (30 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (29 papers) and Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (20 papers). Tea Temim is often cited by papers focused on Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (30 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (29 papers) and Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (20 papers). Tea Temim collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and United Arab Emirates. Tea Temim's co-authors include Patrick Slane, E. Dwek, Joseph D. Gelfand, John P. Hughes, C. Kolb, John M. Blondin, Richard G. Arendt, R. D. Gehrz, Laura A. Lopez and J. M. Laming and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

In The Last Decade

Tea Temim

39 papers receiving 593 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tea Temim United States 14 607 394 16 14 13 42 635
D. Blinov Greece 11 318 0.5× 225 0.6× 20 1.3× 13 0.9× 11 0.8× 56 361
Rishi Khatri India 14 412 0.7× 289 0.7× 18 1.1× 17 1.2× 8 0.6× 31 455
Christopher L. Gerardy United States 16 826 1.4× 362 0.9× 23 1.4× 9 0.6× 14 1.1× 19 833
Tracey DeLaney United States 12 512 0.8× 349 0.9× 17 1.1× 13 0.9× 12 0.9× 21 532
D. M. Worrall United Kingdom 14 537 0.9× 379 1.0× 22 1.4× 6 0.4× 9 0.7× 23 552
Viktoriya Morozova Italy 10 584 1.0× 277 0.7× 25 1.6× 8 0.6× 34 2.6× 16 600
U. Bach Germany 15 599 1.0× 528 1.3× 12 0.8× 11 0.8× 6 0.5× 45 623
T. G. Pannuti United States 16 738 1.2× 459 1.2× 19 1.2× 16 1.1× 16 1.2× 48 750
R. Voss Netherlands 17 778 1.3× 213 0.5× 46 2.9× 13 0.9× 31 2.4× 34 791
Projjwal Banerjee India 10 340 0.6× 202 0.5× 26 1.6× 10 0.7× 6 0.5× 23 385

Countries citing papers authored by Tea Temim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tea Temim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tea Temim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tea Temim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tea Temim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tea Temim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tea Temim. The network helps show where Tea Temim may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tea Temim

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tea Temim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tea Temim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tea Temim. Tea Temim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Woo, Jooyun, Kaya Mori, Charles J. Hailey, et al.. (2025). Spectrum and Location of Ongoing Extreme Particle Acceleration in Cassiopeia A. The Astrophysical Journal. 979(1). 72–72.
2.
Orlando, S., H.‐T. Janka, A. Wongwathanarat, et al.. (2025). Origin of holes and rings in the Green Monster of Cassiopeia A: Insights from 3D magnetohydrodynamic simulations. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 696. A188–A188. 6 indexed citations
3.
Orlando, S., Hans‐Thomas Janka, A. Wongwathanarat, et al.. (2025). Filamentary ejecta network in Cassiopeia A reveals fingerprints of the supernova explosion mechanism. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 696. A108–A108. 5 indexed citations
4.
Blanco, Carlos, et al.. (2025). Sensitivity of JWST to eV-Scale Decaying Axion Dark Matter. Physical Review Letters. 134(7). 71003–71003. 6 indexed citations
5.
Hare, Jeremy, et al.. (2024). Probing the Spectrum of the Magnetar 4U 0142+61 with JWST. The Astrophysical Journal. 972(2). 176–176. 4 indexed citations
6.
Vink, Jacco, Patrick Slane, Ilse De Looze, et al.. (2024). X-Ray Diagnostics of Cassiopeia A’s “Green Monster”: Evidence for Dense Shocked Circumstellar Plasma. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 964(1). L11–L11. 6 indexed citations
7.
Woo, Jooyun, Hongjun An, Joseph D. Gelfand, et al.. (2023). Hard X-Ray Observation and Multiwavelength Study of the PeVatron Candidate Pulsar Wind Nebula “Dragonfly”. The Astrophysical Journal. 954(1). 9–9. 8 indexed citations
8.
Álvarez-Márquez, Javier, Á. Labiano, P. Guillard, et al.. (2023). Nuclear high-ionisation outflow in the Compton-thick AGN NGC 6552 as seen by the JWST mid-infrared instrument. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 672. A108–A108. 11 indexed citations
9.
Mori, Kaya, Joseph D. Gelfand, Charles J. Hailey, et al.. (2022). The Eel Pulsar Wind Nebula: A PeVatron-candidate Origin for HAWC J1826−128 and HESS J1826−130. The Astrophysical Journal. 930(2). 148–148. 1 indexed citations
10.
Castro, Daniel, Tea Temim, J. Ballet, et al.. (2022). MeV–GeV Gamma-Ray Emission from SNR G327.1–1.1 Discovered by the Fermi-LAT. The Astrophysical Journal. 940(2). 143–143. 2 indexed citations
11.
Temim, Tea, Patrick Slane, J. C. Raymond, et al.. (2022). SNR G292.0+1.8: A Remnant of a Low-Mass Progenitor Stripped-Envelope Supernova. arXiv (Cornell University). 11 indexed citations
12.
Straal, Samayra, et al.. (2020). The Nonstandard Properties of a “Standard” PWN: Unveiling the Mysteries of PWN G21.5–0.9 Using Its IR and X-Ray Emission. The Astrophysical Journal. 904(1). 32–32. 10 indexed citations
13.
Corrales, Lía, E. Costantini, Javier A. García, et al.. (2019). Astromineralogy of interstellar dust with X-ray spectroscopy. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 51(3). 264. 3 indexed citations
14.
Lyutikov, Maxim, Tea Temim, S. S. Komissarov, et al.. (2019). Interpreting Crab Nebula’s synchrotron spectrum: two acceleration mechanisms. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 489(2). 2403–2416. 28 indexed citations
15.
Williams, Brian J., John W. Hewitt, Robert Petre, & Tea Temim. (2018). A Deep X-Ray View of the Synchrotron-dominated Supernova Remnant G330.2+1.0. The Astrophysical Journal. 855(2). 118–118. 8 indexed citations
16.
Temim, Tea, E. Dwek, Richard G. Arendt, et al.. (2017). A Massive Shell of Supernova-formed Dust in SNR G54.1+0.3. The Astrophysical Journal. 836(1). 129–129. 42 indexed citations
17.
Klingler, N. J., Blagoy Rangelov, Oleg Kargaltsev, et al.. (2016). DEEP CHANDRA OBSERVATIONS OF THE PULSAR WIND NEBULA CREATED BY PSR B0355+54. The Astrophysical Journal. 833(2). 253–253. 27 indexed citations
18.
Gelfand, Joseph D., Patrick Slane, & Tea Temim. (2014). The properties of the progenitor, neutron star, and pulsar wind in the supernova remnant Kes 75. Astronomische Nachrichten. 335(3). 318–323. 10 indexed citations
20.
Temim, Tea, Patrick Slane, Daniel Castro, et al.. (2013). HIGH-ENERGY EMISSION FROM THE COMPOSITE SUPERNOVA REMNANT MSH 15-56. The Astrophysical Journal. 768(1). 61–61. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026