Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Taylor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Taylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Taylor more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Taylor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Taylor. The network helps show where Taylor may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Taylor
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Taylor.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Taylor based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Taylor. Taylor is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jianhui, et al.. (2012). Voltage Unbalance Mitigation in Low Voltage Distribution Networks with Photovoltaic Systems. 10(1). 1–6.6 indexed citations
3.
Taylor, et al.. (2012). Bearing-only cooperative geo-localization using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. 3883–3888.1 indexed citations
4.
Seo, et al.. (2011). Polarization anisotropy of transient carrier dynamics in single Si nanowires. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics. 1–2.1 indexed citations
5.
Taylor, et al.. (2011). Controller design for nonlinear systems using the robust controller bode (RCBode) plot. American Control Conference. 1414–1419.3 indexed citations
6.
Taylor, et al.. (2011). Pesticide Concentrations in Drinking Water from Farm Homes: Variation between Community Water Supply and Well-Water. 5(8). 955–961.7 indexed citations
7.
Bloch, et al.. (2010). Visual speech synthesis for Polish using keyframe based animation. 423–426.
8.
Paul, et al.. (2008). Chilli anthracnose disease caused by Colletotrichum species. 浙江大学学报:B卷英文版. 9(10). 764–778.4 indexed citations
9.
Jun, Jun, et al.. (2007). Modelling of an hydraulic excavator using simplified refined instrumental variable (SRIV) algorithm. 5(4). 391–396.1 indexed citations
10.
Brian, Brian, et al.. (2006). Fine-particle Mn and other metals linked to the introduction of MMT into gasoline in Sydney, Australia: Results of a natural experiment. 中国地球化学学报:英文版. 25. 62–63.1 indexed citations
Taylor, et al.. (1996). Locating objects of varying shape using statistical feature detectors.14 indexed citations
14.
Taylor, et al.. (1996). Impact of Gate Recess Offset on Pseudomorphic HEMT Performance: A Simulation Study. European Solid-State Device Research Conference. 1017–1020.1 indexed citations
15.
Taylor, et al.. (1996). Automatic measurement of vertebral shape using active shape models. Image and Vision Computing.13 indexed citations
16.
Zhang, et al.. (1990). Electron conduction and charge trapping behaviour of SiO2 prepared by plasma anodisation. European Solid-State Device Research Conference. 265–268.1 indexed citations
Chan, W. R., et al.. (1970). Triterpenoids from [wood of] Entandrophragma cylindricum Sprague. Part I. Structures of sapelins A and B.. Journal of the Chemical Society (Resumed).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.