Tanya Zelevinsky

3.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
56 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

Tanya Zelevinsky is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Tanya Zelevinsky has authored 56 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 55 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 7 papers in Spectroscopy and 6 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Tanya Zelevinsky's work include Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (44 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (32 papers) and Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (28 papers). Tanya Zelevinsky is often cited by papers focused on Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (44 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (32 papers) and Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (28 papers). Tanya Zelevinsky collaborates with scholars based in United States, Poland and Denmark. Tanya Zelevinsky's co-authors include Jun Ye, Martin M. Boyd, Andrew D. Ludlow, Sebastian Blatt, Seth M. Foreman, Svetlana Kotochigova, T. Ido, Mickey McDonald, B. H. McGuyer and J. W. Thomsen and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Physical Review Letters.

In The Last Decade

Tanya Zelevinsky

55 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Quantum sensing and metrology for fundamental physics with molecules

2024 44 citations David DeMille, Nicholas R. Hutzler et al. Nature Physics profile →

Peers

Tanya Zelevinsky

AMPO

SPECT

EEE

AI

SPU

J. E. Stalnaker United States

K. Beloy United States

C. Salomon France

Eric R. Hudson United States

H. S. Margolis United Kingdom

M. H. G. de Miranda Brazil

J. Vigué France

Ch. J. Bordé France

Anne Amy‐Klein France

Jocelyne Guéna France

J. E. Stalnaker United States

Tanya Zelevinsky

2.4k ×1.0

AMPO

249 ×0.8

SPECT

268 ×1.2

EEE

154 ×0.7

AI

220 ×1.7

SPU

Citations per year, relative to Tanya Zelevinsky Tanya Zelevinsky (= 1×) peers J. E. Stalnaker

Countries citing papers authored by Tanya Zelevinsky

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tanya Zelevinsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tanya Zelevinsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tanya Zelevinsky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tanya Zelevinsky

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tanya Zelevinsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tanya Zelevinsky. The network helps show where Tanya Zelevinsky may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tanya Zelevinsky

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tanya Zelevinsky. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tanya Zelevinsky based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tanya Zelevinsky. Tanya Zelevinsky is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Mitra, Debayan, et al.. (2024). Laser cooling of a fermionic molecule. Physical Review Research. 6(3). 5 indexed citations

2.

DeMille, David, Nicholas R. Hutzler, Ana María Rey, & Tanya Zelevinsky. (2024). Quantum sensing and metrology for fundamental physics with molecules. Nature Physics. 20(5). 741–749. 44 indexed citations breakdown →

3.

Dickerson, Claire E., Lan Cheng, Daniel Neuhauser, et al.. (2023). Probing the limits of optical cycling in a predissociative diatomic molecule. Physical Review Research. 5(4). 1 indexed citations

4.

Zelevinsky, Tanya, et al.. (2023). Subnatural Linewidth Superradiant Lasing with Cold Sr88 Atoms. Physical Review Letters. 130(22). 223402–223402. 12 indexed citations

5.

Vazquez-Carson, Sebastian, et al.. (2022). Direct laser cooling of calcium monohydride molecules. New Journal of Physics. 24(8). 83006–83006. 27 indexed citations

6.

Mitra, Debayan, et al.. (2022). Quantum control of molecules for fundamental physics. Physical review. A. 105(4). 28 indexed citations

7.

Vazquez-Carson, Sebastian, et al.. (2021). Laser Cooling of CaH Molecules. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 1 indexed citations

8.

Wright, Trevor, et al.. (2021). CeNTREX: a new search for time-reversal symmetry violation in the ²⁰⁵ Tl nucleus. Quantum Science and Technology. 6(4). 44007–44007. 37 indexed citations

9.

Bekker, Hendrik, et al.. (2020). Transition Strength Measurements to Guide Magic Wavelength Selection in Optically Trapped Molecules. Physical Review Letters. 125(15). 153001–153001. 5 indexed citations

10.

Kondov, Stanimir, et al.. (2018). Crossover from the Ultracold to the Quasiclassical Regime in State-Selected Photodissociation. Physical Review Letters. 121(14). 143401–143401. 7 indexed citations

11.

McDonald, Mickey, et al.. (2016). Photodissociation of ultracold diatomic strontium molecules with quantum state control. Nature. 535(7610). 122–126. 43 indexed citations

12.

McGuyer, B. H., et al.. (2015). Control of Optical Transitions with Magnetic Fields in Weakly Bound Molecules. Physical Review Letters. 115(5). 53001–53001. 14 indexed citations

13.

Reinaudi, G., C. B. Osborn, Mickey McDonald, Svetlana Kotochigova, & Tanya Zelevinsky. (2012). Optical Production of Stable UltracoldSr288Molecules. Physical Review Letters. 109(11). 115303–115303. 64 indexed citations

14.

Zelevinsky, Tanya. (2009). 84Sr—just right for forming a Bose-Einstein condensate. Physics. 2. 1 indexed citations

15.

Blatt, Sebastian, Andrew D. Ludlow, Gretchen K. Campbell, et al.. (2008). New Limits on Coupling of Fundamental Constants to Gravity UsingSr87Optical Lattice Clocks. Physical Review Letters. 100(14). 140801–140801. 196 indexed citations

16.

Zelevinsky, Tanya, Svetlana Kotochigova, & Jun Ye. (2008). Precision Test of Mass-Ratio Variations with Lattice-Confined Ultracold Molecules. Physical Review Letters. 100(4). 43201–43201. 202 indexed citations

17.

Boyd, Martin M., Andrew D. Ludlow, Sebastian Blatt, et al.. (2007). Sr87Lattice Clock with Inaccuracy below10−15. Physical Review Letters. 98(8). 83002–83002. 130 indexed citations

18.

Boyd, Martin M., Andrew D. Ludlow, Tanya Zelevinsky, et al.. (2006). Systematic Study of the $^{87}$Sr Clock Transition in an Optical Lattice. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 37. 37 indexed citations

19.

Ludlow, Andrew D., Martin M. Boyd, Tanya Zelevinsky, et al.. (2006). Systematic Study of theSr87Clock Transition in an Optical Lattice. Physical Review Letters. 96(3). 33003–33003. 137 indexed citations

20.

Zelevinsky, Tanya, et al.. (2005). Precision Measurement of the Three23PJHelium Fine Structure Intervals. Physical Review Letters. 95(20). 203001–203001. 57 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact