Tanya Clement

658 total citations
26 papers, 263 citations indexed

About

Tanya Clement is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Signal Processing and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Tanya Clement has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 263 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 6 papers in Signal Processing and 4 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Tanya Clement's work include Digital Humanities and Scholarship (13 papers), Music and Audio Processing (6 papers) and Diverse Musicological Studies (3 papers). Tanya Clement is often cited by papers focused on Digital Humanities and Scholarship (13 papers), Music and Audio Processing (6 papers) and Diverse Musicological Studies (3 papers). Tanya Clement collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Tanya Clement's co-authors include Loretta Auvil, Daniel R. Carter, Catherine Plaisant, Elena Zheleva, Ben Shneiderman, Martha Nell Smith, Bei Yu, Matthew Kirschenbaum, Amelia Acker and Kathy Toohey-Kurth and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Diseases of Aquatic Organisms and Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.

In The Last Decade

Tanya Clement

22 papers receiving 229 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Tanya Clement United States	8	93	90	76	56	39	26	263
Elli Mylonas United States	9	114 1.2×	125 1.4×	39 0.5×	69 1.2×	28 0.7×	19	302
Greta Franzini Germany	6	82 0.9×	120 1.3×	122 1.6×	37 0.7×	8 0.2×	24	295
Albert Meroño-Peñuela United Kingdom	8	26 0.3×	154 1.7×	50 0.7×	71 1.3×	17 0.4×	52	302
Murtha Baca United States	7	19 0.2×	70 0.8×	31 0.4×	94 1.7×	70 1.8×	28	240
Jouni Tuominen Finland	9	39 0.4×	280 3.1×	39 0.5×	115 2.1×	24 0.6×	57	349
Valentina Bartalesi Italy	11	32 0.3×	176 2.0×	62 0.8×	24 0.4×	20 0.5×	41	303
Stephan Greene United States	4	13 0.1×	148 1.6×	78 1.0×	83 1.5×	14 0.4×	6	276
Milena Dobreva United Kingdom	8	18 0.2×	39 0.4×	29 0.4×	83 1.5×	46 1.2×	40	189
Stefan Boddie New Zealand	7	17 0.2×	81 0.9×	45 0.6×	147 2.6×	10 0.3×	11	263
Linguistic Computing	2	91 1.0×	260 2.9×	19 0.3×	56 1.0×	13 0.3×	2	368

Countries citing papers authored by Tanya Clement

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tanya Clement's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tanya Clement with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tanya Clement more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tanya Clement

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tanya Clement. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tanya Clement. The network helps show where Tanya Clement may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tanya Clement

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tanya Clement. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tanya Clement based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tanya Clement. Tanya Clement is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Clement, Tanya, et al.. (2021). Audiated Annotation from the Middle Ages to the Open Web. Digital humanities quarterly. 15(1).

Xu, Weijia, María Esteva, Kewen Wang, et al.. (2020). A Study of Spoken Audio Processing using Machine Learning for Libraries, Archives and Museums (LAM). 1. 1939–1948. 2 indexed citations

Clement, Tanya & Amelia Acker. (2019). Data Cultures, Culture as Data – Special Issue of Cultural Analytics. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5 indexed citations

Clement, Tanya & Daniel R. Carter. (2017). Connecting theory and practice in digital humanities information work. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(6). 1385–1396. 25 indexed citations

Clement, Tanya & Stephen McLaughlin. (2016). Measured Applause: Toward a Cultural Analysis of Audio Collections. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1(1). 3 indexed citations

Brown, Susan, et al.. (2016). Creating Feminist Infrastructure in the Digital Humanities.. DH. 47–50. 2 indexed citations

Clement, Tanya. (2016). Towards a Rationale of Audio-Text. Digital humanities quarterly. 10(3). 1 indexed citations

Clement, Tanya. (2015). An Information Science Question in DH Feminism. Digital humanities quarterly. 9(2). 1 indexed citations

Clement, Tanya, et al.. (2014). Detection and surveillance of viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus using real-time RT-PCR. I. Initial comparison of four protocols. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms. 111(1). 1–13. 15 indexed citations

10.

Clement, Tanya, et al.. (2014). Detection and surveillance of viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus using real-time RT-PCR. II. Diagnostic evaluation of two protocols. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms. 111(1). 15–22. 11 indexed citations

11.

Clement, Tanya, David Tcheng, Loretta Auvil, Boris Capitanu, & Megan Monroe. (2013). Sounding for Meaning: Using Theories of Knowledge Representation to Analyze Aural Patterns in Texts. Digital humanities quarterly. 7(1). 5 indexed citations

12.

Clement, Tanya, et al.. (2013). Toward a Notion of the Archive of the Future: Impressions of Practice by Librarians, Archivists, and Digital Humanities Scholars. The Library Quarterly. 83(2). 112–130. 36 indexed citations

13.

Clement, Tanya. (2013). Distant Listening or Playing Visualisations Pleasantly with the Eyes and Ears. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(2). 4 indexed citations

14.

Clement, Tanya, et al.. (2012). Sounding for Meaning: Analyzing Aural Patterns Across Large Digital Collections.. DH. 158–161. 3 indexed citations

15.

Clement, Tanya. (2012). The Story ofone: Narrative and Composition in Gertrude Stein'sThe Making of Americans. Texas Studies in Literature & Language. 54(3). 426–448. 2 indexed citations

16.

Clement, Tanya. (2012). Methodologies in the digital humanities for analyzing aural patterns in texts. 14. 287–293. 2 indexed citations

17.

Clement, Tanya, Julia Flanders, Neil Fraistat, et al.. (2011). Off the Tracks: Laying New Lines for Digital Humanities Scholars. Humanities Commons CORE (Modern Language Association / Columbia University). 7 indexed citations

18.

Clement, Tanya. (2008). 'A thing not beginning and not ending': using digital tools to distant-read Gertrude Stein's The Making of Americans. Literary and Linguistic Computing. 23(3). 361–381. 23 indexed citations

19.

Zheleva, Elena, et al.. (2007). Discovering interesting usage patterns in text collections. 213–222. 72 indexed citations

20.

Plaisant, Catherine, Bei Yu, Loretta Auvil, et al.. (2006). Exploring erotics in Emily Dickinson's correspondence with text mining and visual interfaces. 141–150. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact