Tamara Ambrona
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Co-authors
- Belén López‐PérezLuís OcejaPilar CarreraMichaela GummerumEric StocksAmparo CaballeroDolores MuñozMaría Márquez‐González
- Topics
- Emotions and Moral Behavior (8 papers)Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Tamara Ambrona
23 papers receiving 260 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Social Psychology 133
- Clinical Psychology 88
- Sociology and Political Science 64
- Cognitive Neuroscience 60
- Psychiatry and Mental health 47
Countries citing papers authored by Tamara Ambrona
This map shows the geographic impact of Tamara Ambrona's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tamara Ambrona with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tamara Ambrona more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tamara Ambrona
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tamara Ambrona. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tamara Ambrona. The network helps show where Tamara Ambrona may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tamara Ambrona
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tamara Ambrona. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tamara Ambrona based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tamara Ambrona. Tamara Ambrona is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 26 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | Adaptación y validación de un instrumento para la evaluación de la empatía en niños y adolescentes: TECA-NA | 1 |
| 13 | 20 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | 41 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | Measuring general dispositions to feeling empathy and distress. | 14 |
About Tamara Ambrona
Tamara Ambrona is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Leadership and Management and Applied Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 269 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emotions and Moral Behavior (8 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (133 citations), Applied Psychology (31 citations) and Clinical Psychology (88 citations). Tamara Ambrona has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Belén López‐Pérez, Luís Oceja, Pilar Carrera, Michaela Gummerum, Eric Stocks, Amparo Caballero, Dolores Muñoz, María Márquez‐González, J.S. Gregory and Irene Fernández. Their work appears in journals such as Motivation and Emotion, Nurse Education Today and British Journal of Clinical Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.