Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Hadronic Light-by-Light Scattering Contribution to the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment from Lattice QCD
2020301 citationsThomas Blum, Norman H. Christ et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
Calculation of the Hadronic Vacuum Polarization Contribution to the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment
2018238 citationsThomas Blum, Vera Gülpers et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Taku Izubuchi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Taku Izubuchi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Taku Izubuchi more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Taku Izubuchi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Taku Izubuchi. The network helps show where Taku Izubuchi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Taku Izubuchi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Taku Izubuchi.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Taku Izubuchi based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Taku Izubuchi. Taku Izubuchi is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jin, Luchang, et al.. (2022). Pion electric polarizabilities from lattice QCD. Proceedings of The 38th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory — PoS(LATTICE2021). 362–362.5 indexed citations
8.
Blum, Thomas, Norman H. Christ, Masashi Hayakawa, et al.. (2020). Hadronic Light-by-Light Scattering Contribution to the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment from Lattice QCD. Physical Review Letters. 124(13).301 indexed citations breakdown →
Mawhinney, Robert D., Tom Blum, Peter A. Boyle, et al.. (2014). Weak Decay Measurements from 2+1 flavor DWF Ensembles. Proceedings of 31st International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory LATTICE 2013 — PoS(LATTICE 2013). 404–404.1 indexed citations
16.
Blum, Tom, Masashi Hayakawa, & Taku Izubuchi. (2013). Update on the hadronic light-by-light contribution to the muon g 2 and inclusion of dynamically charged sea quarks. 439.1 indexed citations
17.
Blum, Thomas, Norman H. Christ, Nicolas Garrón, et al.. (2012). K→(ππ)I=2Decay Amplitude from Lattice QCD. Physical Review Letters. 108(14). 141601–141601.67 indexed citations
18.
Kadoh, Daisuke, Sinya Aoki, N. Ishii, et al.. (2008). SU(2) and SU(3) chiral perturbation theory analyses on meson and baryon masses in 2+1 flavor lattice QCD. Talk given at. 92.1 indexed citations
19.
Albertus, C., Yasumichi Aoki, Norman H. Christ, et al.. (2007). B - anti-B mixing with domain wall fermions in the static approximation. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 376.
20.
Khan, A. Ali, S. Aoki, Yasumichi Aoki, et al.. (2001). KaonBparameter from quenched domain-wall QCD. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 64(11).42 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.