Takeshi Terao
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- Nobuyoshi IshiiNoboru IwataKazuhiko AbeJun NakamuraHideki KojimaOsamu OhmoriReiji YoshimuraTakahiro Shinkai
- Topics
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (62 papers)Schizophrenia research and treatment (31 papers)Treatment of Major Depression (21 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEBiological Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Takeshi Terao
171 papers receiving 2.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.2k
- Clinical Psychology 567
- Cognitive Neuroscience 531
- Molecular Biology 466
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 364
Countries citing papers authored by Takeshi Terao
This map shows the geographic impact of Takeshi Terao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Takeshi Terao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Takeshi Terao more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Takeshi Terao
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Takeshi Terao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Takeshi Terao. The network helps show where Takeshi Terao may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Takeshi Terao
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Takeshi Terao. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Takeshi Terao based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Takeshi Terao. Takeshi Terao is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 67 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | [L-tryptophan-induced eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome, Chinese restaurant syndrome]. | 1 |
| 20 | 7 |
About Takeshi Terao
Takeshi Terao is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Biological Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, having authored 180 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (62 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (31 papers) and Treatment of Major Depression (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (332 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (1.2k citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (172 citations). Takeshi Terao has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Nobuyoshi Ishii, Noboru Iwata, Kazuhiko Abe, Jun Nakamura, Hideki Kojima, Osamu Ohmori, Reiji Yoshimura, Takahiro Shinkai, Ippei Shiotsuki and Nobuhiko Hoaki. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Biological Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.