Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Histological Typing of Lung and Pleural Tumours
19991.3k citationsWilliam D. Travis, T. V. Colby et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of T. V. Colby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. V. Colby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. V. Colby more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. V. Colby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. V. Colby. The network helps show where T. V. Colby may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. V. Colby
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. V. Colby.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. V. Colby based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with T. V. Colby. T. V. Colby is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Herzog, Erica L., et al.. (2008). Knowns and Unknowns of the Alveolus. Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society. 5(7). 778–782.99 indexed citations
Leslie, Kevin O., Richard A. Helmers, Louis A. Lanza, & T. V. Colby. (2000). Processing and evaluation of lung biopsy specimens. 5(14). 55–62.1 indexed citations
6.
Travis, William D., T. V. Colby, B Corrin, Yukío Shimosato, & E. Brambilla. (1999). Histological Typing of Lung and Pleural Tumours.1271 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Colby, T. V., et al.. (1998). Organizing Pneumonia. Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice. 7(Supplement). 328–330.1 indexed citations
8.
Colby, T. V. & Ulrich Specks. (1993). Wegener's granulomatosis in the 1990s--a pulmonary pathologist's perspective.. PubMed. 195–218.21 indexed citations
9.
Colby, T. V., et al.. (1993). Tryptophan-induced lung disease: an immunophenotypic, immunofluorescent, and electron microscopic study.. PubMed. 6(1). 56–60.8 indexed citations
10.
Butler, Alexandra E. & T. V. Colby. (1990). Lymphoepitheliomalike Carcinoma of Lung. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 14(7). 698–698.124 indexed citations
11.
Colby, T. V., et al.. (1989). Utility of bronchoalveolar lavage in the diagnosis of drug-induced pulmonary toxicity.. PubMed. 33(4). 533–8.14 indexed citations
12.
Colby, T. V., et al.. (1987). Simultaneous cytomegalovirus and herpes simplex virus pneumonia.. PubMed. 111(3). 242–5.8 indexed citations
13.
Flint, Andrew, et al.. (1986). Pulmonary histiocytosis X. Immunoperoxidase staining for HLA-DR antigen and S100 protein.. PubMed. 110(10). 930–3.15 indexed citations
14.
Rf, Dorfman & T. V. Colby. (1982). The pathologist's role in management of patients with Hodgkin's disease.. PubMed. 66(4). 675–80.12 indexed citations
15.
Colby, T. V.. (1980). Carcinoid tumor of the bladder. A case report.. PubMed. 104(4). 199–200.32 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.