T. Taylor

3.1k total citations
48 papers, 433 citations indexed

About

T. Taylor is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Aerospace Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, T. Taylor has authored 48 papers receiving a total of 433 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 44 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 32 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and 31 papers in Aerospace Engineering. Recurrent topics in T. Taylor's work include Superconducting Materials and Applications (44 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (31 papers) and Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (31 papers). T. Taylor is often cited by papers focused on Superconducting Materials and Applications (44 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (31 papers) and Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (31 papers). T. Taylor collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, United Kingdom and Japan. T. Taylor's co-authors include R. Ostojić, G. Kirby, A. Ballarino, Herman H.J. ten Kate, A. Yamamoto, L. Rossi, O. Brüning, A. Devred, L. Tavian and R. Cappi and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment.

In The Last Decade

T. Taylor

45 papers receiving 372 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
T. Taylor Switzerland 11 369 276 250 127 98 48 433
A. Anghel Switzerland 12 388 1.1× 212 0.8× 181 0.7× 149 1.2× 135 1.4× 39 436
V. Datskov Switzerland 11 271 0.7× 186 0.7× 150 0.6× 128 1.0× 30 0.3× 42 336
G. Chlachidze United States 13 578 1.6× 494 1.8× 408 1.6× 110 0.9× 63 0.6× 85 611
F. Rodríguez-Mateos Switzerland 12 378 1.0× 271 1.0× 219 0.9× 61 0.5× 130 1.3× 56 417
G. Ganetis United States 13 381 1.0× 268 1.0× 234 0.9× 158 1.2× 64 0.7× 68 423
R. Carcagno United States 10 287 0.8× 262 0.9× 253 1.0× 57 0.4× 59 0.6× 57 356
M. Karppinen Switzerland 12 398 1.1× 342 1.2× 334 1.3× 68 0.5× 31 0.3× 64 463
K.H. Mess Germany 6 215 0.6× 157 0.6× 154 0.6× 65 0.5× 40 0.4× 18 256
W. Sampson United States 14 425 1.2× 276 1.0× 185 0.7× 246 1.9× 59 0.6× 61 478
C. Mayri France 11 273 0.7× 198 0.7× 133 0.5× 46 0.4× 87 0.9× 47 315

Countries citing papers authored by T. Taylor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. Taylor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Taylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Taylor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. Taylor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Taylor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Taylor. The network helps show where T. Taylor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. Taylor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. Taylor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. Taylor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with T. Taylor. T. Taylor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ballarino, A., P. Bauer, B. Bordini, et al.. (2015). Qualification of Fin-Type Heat Exchangers for the ITER Current Leads. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering. 101. 12119–12119. 3 indexed citations
2.
Yang, Y., et al.. (2013). Critical Current and Stability of $\hbox{MgB}_{2}$ Twisted-Pair DC Cable Assembly Cooled by Helium Gas. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 23(3). 4801204–4801204. 1 indexed citations
3.
Ballarino, A., P. Bauer, A. Devred, et al.. (2011). Design of the HTS Current Leads for ITER. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 22(3). 4800304–4800304. 45 indexed citations
4.
Yamamoto, A., Y. Makida, R. Ruber, et al.. (2007). The ATLAS central solenoid. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 584(1). 53–74. 21 indexed citations
5.
Ruggiero, F., R. Ostojić, L. Rossi, et al.. (2004). PERFORMANCE LIMITS AND IR DESIGN OF A POSSIBLE LHC LUMINOSITY UPGRADE BASED ON NbTi SC MAGNET TECHNOLOGY. 9 indexed citations
6.
Napoly, O., P. Sievers, T. Taylor, & B. Zotter. (2002). Progress on the CLIC final focus system. 3228–3230.
7.
Ostojić, R., T. Taylor, & S. Weisz. (2002). Systems layout of the low-β insertions for the LHC experiments. Proceedings of the 1997 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.97CH36167). 3. 3696–3698. 2 indexed citations
8.
Scandale, W., B. Jeanneret, X. L. Luo, et al.. (2002). The lattice of the CERN Large Hadron Collider. Proceedings Particle Accelerator Conference. 5. 2844–2846.
9.
Taylor, T.. (2002). SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNETS FOR A SUPER LHC. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 17 indexed citations
10.
Ouden, A. den, et al.. (2001). Progress in the development of an 88-mm bore 10 T Nb/sub 3/Sn dipole magnet. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 11(1). 2268–2271. 11 indexed citations
11.
Taylor, T.. (2000). The magnets for the LHC experiments. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 10(1). 342–346. 4 indexed citations
12.
Taylor, T.. (1999). HTS current leads for the LHC. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 9(2). 412–415. 8 indexed citations
13.
Nakamoto, T., К. Таnака, A. Yamamoto, et al.. (1999). Quench and mechanical behavior of an LHC low-β quadrupole model. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 9(2). 697–700. 8 indexed citations
14.
Lamm, M.J., G. Kirby, R. Ostojić, et al.. (1999). Tests of a 70 mm aperture quadrupole for the LHC low-beta insertions. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 9(2). 455–458. 5 indexed citations
15.
Yamamoto, A., K. Tsuchiya, N. Higashi, et al.. (1997). Design study of a superconducting insertion quadrupole magnet for the Large Hadron Collider. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 7(2). 747–750. 25 indexed citations
16.
Kirby, G., T. Taylor, Kazuhiro Tanaka, et al.. (1997). Mechanical Design and Characteristics of a Superconducting Insertion Quadrupole Model Magnet for the Large Hadron Collider. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 5. 7 indexed citations
17.
Taylor, T., et al.. (1992). Design of the superconducting quadrupoles for the LEP200 low-beta insertions. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 28(1). 382–385. 4 indexed citations
18.
Taylor, T., et al.. (1991). Field shaping by iron for muon measurement at hadron colliders. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 301(3). 451–453. 1 indexed citations
19.
Hutton, A., M. Placidi, & T. Taylor. (1984). Improvements to the LEP lattice design. CERN Bulletin. 2 indexed citations
20.
Jowett, J. M. & T. Taylor. (1983). Wigglers for Control of Beam Characteristics in LEP. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 30(4). 2581–2583. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026