Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Fate of coronary aneurysms in Kawasaki disease: Serial coronary angiography and long-term follow-up study
1982369 citationsHirohisa Kato, E Ichinose et al.The American Journal of Cardiologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of T Takechi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T Takechi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T Takechi more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by T Takechi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T Takechi. The network helps show where T Takechi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of T Takechi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T Takechi.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T Takechi based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with T Takechi. T Takechi is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Andò, Filippo, et al.. (1996). [Successful scartectomy and cryoablation for ventricular tachycardia occurring late after correction of tetralogy of Fallot].. PubMed. 44(5). 664–7.1 indexed citations
2.
Okamoto, F, et al.. (1994). [Right-sided infective endocarditis with ventricular septal defect].. PubMed. 14(1). 49–52.3 indexed citations
3.
Ikeda, Tadashi, et al.. (1993). [A surgical case of cor triatriatum].. PubMed. 46(13). 1137–9.1 indexed citations
4.
K, Oda, et al.. (1993). [A case report: partial anomalous pulmonary venous return of the left lung communicating with the left atrium through the aberrant vein].. PubMed. 46(6). 533–5.3 indexed citations
5.
Nakanishi, Koki, Yuui Yokota, F Okamoto, et al.. (1992). [Late results of the subclavian flap repair for aortic coarctation-effects on the left upper limb].. PubMed. 45(3). 204–7.1 indexed citations
6.
Sugita, T, et al.. (1992). [Cardiac strangulation with permanent epicardial pacemaker lead].. PubMed. 45(5). 456–8.3 indexed citations
7.
Ichinose, E, Eto Y, T Takechi, Fumio Yoshioka, & Hirofumi Kato. (1982). [Two-dimensional echocardiographic study of coronary artery lesion in Kawasaki disease: a new approach to visualize the right coronary artery].. PubMed. 12(1). 111–24.2 indexed citations
8.
Kato, Hirohisa, E Ichinose, Fumio Yoshioka, et al.. (1982). Fate of coronary aneurysms in Kawasaki disease: Serial coronary angiography and long-term follow-up study. The American Journal of Cardiology. 49(7). 1758–1766.369 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Rikitake, Noriko, T Takechi, Keishiro Suzuki, et al.. (1981). [Fetal echocardiography: structural evaluation of the fetal heart and prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease (author's transl)].. PubMed. 11(4). 1319–27.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.