Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A human intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM-1) distinct from LFA-1.
19861.2k citationsMichael L. Dustin, Sandrine Marlin et al.The Journal of Immunologyprofile →
This map shows the geographic impact of T. Springer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Springer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Springer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Springer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Springer. The network helps show where T. Springer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. Springer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. Springer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. Springer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with T. Springer. T. Springer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rebischung, Paul, Z. Altamimi, & T. Springer. (2013). Insensitivity of GNSS to geocenter motion through the network shift approach (Invited). AGUFM. 2013.1 indexed citations
2.
Otten, Michiel, et al.. (2012). Multi-technique combination at observation level with NAPEOS: combining GPS, GLONASS and LEO satellites.. EGUGA. 7925.2 indexed citations
3.
Springer, T., et al.. (2012). Spreading the usage of NAPEOS, the ESA tool for satellite geodesy.. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. 7099.3 indexed citations
4.
Dilßner, Florian, et al.. (2011). GPS IIF yaw attitude control during eclipse season. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2011.9 indexed citations
5.
Springer, T. & Rolf Dach. (2010). GPS, GLONASS and More. Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern).2 indexed citations
6.
Dach, Rolf, Stefan Schaer, T. Springer, et al.. (2008). Multi-GNSS Processing. Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern).2 indexed citations
7.
Beutler, Gerhard, H. Bock, Rolf Dach, et al.. (2007). Bernese GPS Software Version 5.0. Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern).704 indexed citations breakdown →
Hugentobler, Urs, Stefan Schaer, T. Springer, et al.. (2001). CODE IGS Analysis Center Technical Report 2000. 73–82.40 indexed citations
11.
Neilan, R. E., et al.. (2000). International GPS Service 2000: Life without SA. Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences). 438–446.5 indexed citations
12.
Springer, T.. (2000). Common Interests of the IGS and the IVS. 296–305.5 indexed citations
Denning, Stephen M., Michael L. Dustin, T. Springer, K H Singer, & Barton F. Haynes. (1988). PURIFIED LFA-3 ANTIGEN ACTIVATES HUMAN THYMOCYTES VIA THE CD2 PATHWAY. Clinical research. 36.2 indexed citations
19.
Dustin, Michael L., et al.. (1987). PURIFICATION AND CD2 BINDING FUNCTION OF LFA-3. 46. 1498–1498.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.