T. O. Pocock

571 total citations
11 papers, 424 citations indexed

About

T. O. Pocock is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, T. O. Pocock has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 424 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Plant Science, 1 paper in Molecular Biology and 1 paper in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in T. O. Pocock's work include Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing (5 papers), Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement (3 papers) and Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (3 papers). T. O. Pocock is often cited by papers focused on Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing (5 papers), Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement (3 papers) and Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (3 papers). T. O. Pocock collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. T. O. Pocock's co-authors include G. F. J. Milford, Janet Riley, Michael J. Armstrong, K. W. Jaggard, Paul B. Cavers, W. Day, Ernest Small, P. V. Biscoe, P. J. Goodman and John R. Lenton and has published in prestigious journals such as Plant Growth Regulation, The Journal of Agricultural Science and Annals of Applied Biology.

In The Last Decade

T. O. Pocock

11 papers receiving 349 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
T. O. Pocock United States	9	377	103	78	47	40	11	424
Joe E. Street United States	16	598 1.6×	91 0.9×	173 2.2×	24 0.5×	58 1.4×	42	664
E. C. Gilmore United States	7	347 0.9×	53 0.5×	156 2.0×	39 0.8×	60 1.5×	14	442
Vagn O. Mogensen Denmark	10	550 1.5×	84 0.8×	138 1.8×	115 2.4×	35 0.9×	11	637
R. K. Atkin United States	8	289 0.8×	67 0.7×	84 1.1×	60 1.3×	58 1.4×	16	382
WM Blacklow Australia	13	391 1.0×	89 0.9×	168 2.2×	31 0.7×	40 1.0×	24	478
R.C. Rosecrance United States	10	342 0.9×	162 1.6×	106 1.4×	44 0.9×	30 0.8×	17	479
M. D. Clegg United States	17	361 1.0×	128 1.2×	235 3.0×	51 1.1×	35 0.9×	35	567
Juan Pablo del Monte Díaz de Guereñu Spain	10	310 0.8×	69 0.7×	146 1.9×	23 0.5×	36 0.9×	26	406
Clyde L. Elmore United States	15	464 1.2×	65 0.6×	98 1.3×	16 0.3×	41 1.0×	44	546
CT Gates Australia	13	331 0.9×	74 0.7×	117 1.5×	45 1.0×	29 0.7×	29	416

Countries citing papers authored by T. O. Pocock

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. O. Pocock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. O. Pocock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. O. Pocock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. O. Pocock

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. O. Pocock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. O. Pocock. The network helps show where T. O. Pocock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. O. Pocock

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. O. Pocock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. O. Pocock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with T. O. Pocock. T. O. Pocock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Small, Ernest, T. O. Pocock, & Paul B. Cavers. (2003). The biology of Canadian weeds. 119. Cannabis sativa L.. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 83(1). 217–237. 40 indexed citations

2.

Pocock, T. O., et al.. (1992). Use of a nitrate leaching model to predict spring soil mineral nitrogen contents in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris ) fields. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository). 445–450. 1 indexed citations

3.

Pocock, T. O., G. F. J. Milford, & Michael J. Armstrong. (1990). Storage root quality in sugarbeet in relation to nitrogen uptake. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 115(3). 355–362. 31 indexed citations

4.

Milford, G. F. J., et al.. (1988). Growth and dry-matter partitioning in sugar beet. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 110(2). 301–308. 34 indexed citations

5.

Armstrong, Michael J., et al.. (1986). The dynamics of nitrogen uptake and its remobilization during the growth of sugar beet. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 107(1). 145–154. 29 indexed citations

6.

Milford, G. F. J., T. O. Pocock, & Janet Riley. (1985). An analysis of leaf growth in sugar beet.. Annals of Applied Biology. 106(1). 163–172. 71 indexed citations

7.

Milford, G. F. J., et al.. (1985). An analysis of leaf growth in sugar beet.. Annals of Applied Biology. 106(1). 187–203. 60 indexed citations

8.

Milford, G. F. J., T. O. Pocock, K. W. Jaggard, et al.. (1985). An analysis of leaf growth in sugar beet.. Annals of Applied Biology. 107(2). 335–347. 56 indexed citations

9.

Milford, G. F. J., T. O. Pocock, & Janet Riley. (1985). An analysis of leaf growth in sugar beet.. Annals of Applied Biology. 106(1). 173–185. 90 indexed citations

10.

Lenton, John R., et al.. (1984). Phytohormone changes during storage root growth in Beta species. Plant Growth Regulation. 2(4). 371–380. 11 indexed citations

11.

Pocock, T. O. & John R. Lenton. (1980). Potential use of retardants for chemical control of bolting in sugar beet.. 41–51. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact