Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri‐environment schemes in five European countries
2006780 citationsDavid Kleijn, Rocío A. Baquero et al.Ecology Lettersprofile →
Citations per year, relative to T. M. West T. M. West (= 1×)
peers
José Luís Yela
Countries citing papers authored by T. M. West
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of T. M. West's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. M. West with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. M. West more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. M. West. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. M. West. The network helps show where T. M. West may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. M. West
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. M. West.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. M. West based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with T. M. West. T. M. West is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Kleijn, David, Rocío A. Baquero, Yann Clough, et al.. (2006). Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri‐environment schemes in five European countries. Ecology Letters. 9(3). 243–254.780 indexed citations breakdown →
Marshall, E. J. P., et al.. (2001). Effects of management on the biodiversity of English hedgerows. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository).2 indexed citations
4.
Marshall, E. J. P., et al.. (2001). Treatments to restore the diversity of herbaceous flora of hedgerows. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository).1 indexed citations
5.
West, T. M. & E. J. P. Marshall. (2001). Increasing botanical diversity and reducing weed abundance in degraded hedge-bases. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository). 727–732.1 indexed citations
6.
West, T. M., E. J. P. Marshall, N. D. Boatman, et al.. (2000). The impacts of hedge management on wildlife: preliminary results for plants and insects.. Aspects of applied biology. 389–396.12 indexed citations
7.
West, T. M., E. J. P. Marshall, & G. M. Arnold. (1997). Can sown field boundary strips reduce the ingress of aggressive field margin weeds. 985–990.16 indexed citations
8.
West, T. M. & N. C. B. Peters. (1992). Response of Bromus sterilis plants, grown from different seedstocks, to post-emergence herbicide treatments of isoproturon and metoxuron.. 120(13). 62–63.1 indexed citations
9.
West, T. M., et al.. (1989). Response of bracken and eight pasture grass species to some sulfonylurea herbicides.. Europe PMC (PubMed Central). 3. 12320–23408139424353897902.2 indexed citations
Parker, Gordon, et al.. (1980). Potential for extending the selectivity of DPX 4189 by use of herbicide safeners.. 15–22.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.