T. M. Hinckley

2.1k total citations
41 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

T. M. Hinckley is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, T. M. Hinckley has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 19 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 17 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in T. M. Hinckley's work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (19 papers), Forest ecology and management (12 papers) and Tree-ring climate responses (6 papers). T. M. Hinckley is often cited by papers focused on Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (19 papers), Forest ecology and management (12 papers) and Tree-ring climate responses (6 papers). T. M. Hinckley collaborates with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Germany. T. M. Hinckley's co-authors include R. O. Teskey, R. Ceulemans, Frederick C. Meinzer, J. G. Isebrands, R. F. Stettler, Paul E. Heilman, David Whitehead, Douglas G. Sprugel, Timothy A. Martin and Peter B. Reich and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres and Oecologia.

In The Last Decade

T. M. Hinckley

40 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
T. M. Hinckley United States 21 1.1k 702 561 469 234 41 1.6k
Shepard M. Zedaker United States 21 835 0.8× 1.1k 1.6× 375 0.7× 163 0.3× 79 0.3× 72 1.6k
Guy R. Larocque Canada 24 876 0.8× 910 1.3× 210 0.4× 169 0.4× 215 0.9× 82 1.5k
S. J. Colombo Canada 24 830 0.8× 678 1.0× 475 0.8× 169 0.4× 125 0.5× 80 1.5k
Gaby Deckmyn Belgium 22 889 0.8× 465 0.7× 583 1.0× 338 0.7× 135 0.6× 50 1.7k
Jens Peter Skovsgaard Denmark 18 1.1k 1.0× 1.4k 2.0× 242 0.4× 279 0.6× 63 0.3× 38 2.0k
Petra Lasch‐Born Germany 22 1.7k 1.6× 1.3k 1.8× 234 0.4× 390 0.8× 91 0.4× 38 2.3k
David D. Reed United States 23 806 0.7× 915 1.3× 243 0.4× 225 0.5× 37 0.2× 77 1.5k
Ricardo Ruíz‐Peinado Spain 24 1.4k 1.3× 1.5k 2.2× 231 0.4× 305 0.7× 99 0.4× 58 2.1k
Juan A. Blanco Spain 27 1.2k 1.1× 1.1k 1.5× 358 0.6× 412 0.9× 66 0.3× 96 2.1k
Qing‐Lai Dang Canada 22 1.0k 0.9× 649 0.9× 587 1.0× 479 1.0× 45 0.2× 84 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by T. M. Hinckley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. M. Hinckley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. M. Hinckley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. M. Hinckley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. M. Hinckley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. M. Hinckley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. M. Hinckley. The network helps show where T. M. Hinckley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. M. Hinckley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. M. Hinckley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. M. Hinckley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with T. M. Hinckley. T. M. Hinckley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kennedy, Maureen C., E. David Ford, & T. M. Hinckley. (2009). Defining how aging Pseudotsuga and Abies compensate for multiple stresses through multi-criteria assessment of a functional-structural model. Tree Physiology. 30(1). 3–22. 10 indexed citations
2.
3.
Anderson, Richard, et al.. (2007). Supporting classroom discussion with technology: A case study in environmental science. Proceedings/Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference. 61. F1D–4. 9 indexed citations
4.
McDowell, Nate G., Holly Barnard, B. J. Bond, et al.. (2002). The relationship between tree height and leaf area: sapwood area ratio. Oecologia. 132(1). 12–20. 257 indexed citations
6.
Wu, Rongxiang & T. M. Hinckley. (2001). Phenotypic Plasticity of Sylleptic Branching: Genetic Design of Tree Architecture. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 20(5). 467–486. 1 indexed citations
7.
Hinckley, T. M., et al.. (1999). Lessons from Montane Forests of the Pacific Northwest. 39(4). 73–84. 3 indexed citations
8.
Martin, Timothy A., T. M. Hinckley, Frederick C. Meinzer, & Douglas G. Sprugel. (1999). Boundary layer conductance, leaf temperature and transpiration of Abies amabilis branches. Tree Physiology. 19(7). 435–443. 121 indexed citations
9.
Whitehead, David & T. M. Hinckley. (1991). Models of water flux through forest stands: critical leaf and stand parameters. Tree Physiology. 9(1-2). 35–57. 29 indexed citations
10.
Ceulemans, R., R. F. Stettler, T. M. Hinckley, J. G. Isebrands, & Paul E. Heilman. (1990). Crown architecture ofPopulusclones as determined by branch orientation and branch characteristics. Tree Physiology. 7(1-2-3-4). 157–167. 95 indexed citations
11.
Dhyani, Praveen, K. Kreeb, Hanno Richter, & T. M. Hinckley. (1989). Responses of sun and shade grown tree leaves to water vapor transfer processes and energy exchange characteristics.. 191–198. 1 indexed citations
12.
Borralho, Nuno, M. C. Araújo, J. S. Pereira, et al.. (1989). Influence of water supply on crown structure and production of three clones of Eucalyptus globulus in the juvenile phase.. 181–190. 6 indexed citations
13.
Lechowicz, Martin J., et al.. (1989). Comparative ecology of drought response in hardwood trees: Acer saccharum versus Fraxinus americana.. 283–292. 4 indexed citations
14.
Ceulemans, R., T. M. Hinckley, Paul E. Heilman, J. G. Isebrands, & R. F. Stettler. (1989). Crown architecture in relation to productivity of Populus clones in the Pacific Northwest, U.S.A. Annales des Sciences Forestières. 46(Supplement). 199s–201s. 5 indexed citations
15.
Schulte, Paul J., et al.. (1985). The effect of tephra deposition and planting teatment on soil oxygen levels and water relations of newly planted seedlings. Forest Science. 31(1). 109–116. 1 indexed citations
16.
Kuhns, Michael R., H. E. Garrett, R. O. Teskey, & T. M. Hinckley. (1985). Root Growth of Black Walnut Trees Related to Soil Temperature, Soil Water Potential, and Leaf Water Potential. Forest Science. 31(3). 617–629. 76 indexed citations
17.
Hinckley, T. M., et al.. (1983). Foliage damage in coniferous trees following volcanic ashfall from Mt. St. Helens. Oecologia. 59(2-3). 339–343. 28 indexed citations
18.
Reich, Peter B., R. O. Teskey, Paul S. Johnson, & T. M. Hinckley. (1980). Periodic Root and Shoot Growth in Oak. Forest Science. 26(4). 590–598. 115 indexed citations
19.
Pill, Wallace G., et al.. (1979). EFFECTS OF CYCOCEL AND NITROGEN FORM ON TOMATO WATER RELATIONS, ION COMPOSITION, AND YIELD. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 59(2). 391–397. 2 indexed citations
20.
Hinckley, T. M., et al.. (1974). Effect of Mid-day Shading on Stem Diameter, Xylem Pressure Potential, Leaf Surface Resistance, and Net Assimilation Rate in a White Oak Sapling. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 4(3). 296–300. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026