T. H. Goodspeed is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Molecular Biology and Immunology.
According to data from OpenAlex, T. H. Goodspeed has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 441 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Biotechnology, 2 papers in Molecular Biology and 2 papers in Immunology. Recurrent topics in T. H. Goodspeed's work include Transgenic Plants and Applications (4 papers), Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (2 papers) and Plant tissue culture and regeneration (2 papers). T. H. Goodspeed is often cited by papers focused on Transgenic Plants and Applications (4 papers), Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (2 papers) and Plant tissue culture and regeneration (2 papers). T. H. Goodspeed collaborates with scholars based in United States. T. H. Goodspeed's co-authors include N. Y. Sandwith and W. B. Turrill and has published in prestigious journals such as Soil Science, Geographical Journal and The Botanical Review.
In The Last Decade
T. H. Goodspeed
5 papers
receiving
399 citations
Hit Papers
What are hit papers?
Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Genus Nicotiana
1955327 citationsT. H. GoodspeedSoil Scienceprofile →
Citations per year, relative to T. H. Goodspeed T. H. Goodspeed (= 1×)
peers
N. G. Hogenboom
Countries citing papers authored by T. H. Goodspeed
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of T. H. Goodspeed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. H. Goodspeed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. H. Goodspeed more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. H. Goodspeed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. H. Goodspeed. The network helps show where T. H. Goodspeed may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. H. Goodspeed
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. H. Goodspeed.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. H. Goodspeed based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with T. H. Goodspeed. T. H. Goodspeed is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Sandwith, N. Y. & T. H. Goodspeed. (1962). Plant Hunters in the Andes. Geographical Journal. 128(4). 541–541.3 indexed citations
2.
Goodspeed, T. H., et al.. (1959). Cytotaxonomy of Nicotiana. II. The Botanical Review. 25(2). 385–415.15 indexed citations
Goodspeed, T. H., et al.. (1955). The University of California Botanical Garden expeditions to the Andes (1935-1952) with observations on the phytogeography of Peru. University of California Press eBooks.1 indexed citations
5.
Turrill, W. B. & T. H. Goodspeed. (1955). The Genus Nicotiana. Kew Bulletin. 10(3). 357–357.1 indexed citations
6.
Goodspeed, T. H.. (1955). The Genus Nicotiana. Soil Science. 80(3). 250–250.327 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Goodspeed, T. H., et al.. (1951). A Naturalist in the Gran Chaco. Geographical Journal. 117(1). 99–99.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.