T. G. Steele

2.4k total citations
123 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

T. G. Steele is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, T. G. Steele has authored 123 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 121 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 14 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 4 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in T. G. Steele's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (114 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (104 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (76 papers). T. G. Steele is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (114 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (104 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (76 papers). T. G. Steele collaborates with scholars based in Canada, China and United States. T. G. Steele's co-authors include V. Elias, Robert B. Mann, Wei Chen, Hua-Xing Chen, Shi-Lin Zhu, D. G. C. McKeon, Farrukh Chishtie, E. Bagán, Xiang Liu and Zhi-Wei Wang and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nuclear Physics B and Physics Letters B.

In The Last Decade

T. G. Steele

120 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
T. G. Steele Canada 25 1.6k 309 121 120 76 123 1.7k
M. E. Carrington Canada 19 1.1k 0.6× 474 1.5× 115 1.0× 315 2.6× 108 1.4× 90 1.3k
Hidenori Sonoda United States 16 758 0.5× 134 0.4× 268 2.2× 128 1.1× 68 0.9× 58 926
S. Uehara Japan 17 1.7k 1.1× 475 1.5× 371 3.1× 112 0.9× 76 1.0× 63 1.8k
Antonio González-Arroyo Spain 22 1.8k 1.1× 321 1.0× 262 2.2× 127 1.1× 234 3.1× 109 2.0k
S. T. Love United States 18 1.6k 1.0× 486 1.6× 197 1.6× 193 1.6× 92 1.2× 62 1.7k
Henri Lehmann United States 5 1.3k 0.8× 256 0.8× 209 1.7× 200 1.7× 254 3.3× 5 1.5k
J. Sloan United States 16 1.4k 0.9× 636 2.1× 213 1.8× 83 0.7× 71 0.9× 41 1.5k
Mu-Lin Yan China 17 804 0.5× 341 1.1× 250 2.1× 99 0.8× 35 0.5× 62 880
V. Gorbenko United States 14 723 0.4× 446 1.4× 199 1.6× 153 1.3× 128 1.7× 32 907
Julien Serreau France 26 1.4k 0.8× 597 1.9× 221 1.8× 419 3.5× 92 1.2× 55 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by T. G. Steele

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. G. Steele's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. G. Steele with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. G. Steele more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. G. Steele

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. G. Steele. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. G. Steele. The network helps show where T. G. Steele may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. G. Steele

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. G. Steele. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. G. Steele based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with T. G. Steele. T. G. Steele is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Chen, Wei, et al.. (2024). Strong decays of $$T^a_{c{\bar{s}0}}(2900)^{++/0}$$ as a fully open-flavor tetraquark state. The European Physical Journal C. 84(1). 31 indexed citations
3.
Steele, T. G., et al.. (2023). Sum-rules analysis of next-to-leading-order QCD perturbative contributions to a JPC=0+, dud¯u¯ tetraquark correlator. Physical review. D. 108(3). 2 indexed citations
4.
5.
Steele, T. G., et al.. (2021). Correlations between the strange quark condensate, strange quark mass, and kaon PCAC relation. Physical review. D. 103(11). 6 indexed citations
6.
Fariborz, Amir H., et al.. (2020). The Bridge Between Chiral Lagrangians and QCD Sum-Rules. Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings. 309-311. 119–123. 1 indexed citations
7.
Steele, T. G., et al.. (2019). Axial vector cc and bb diquark masses from QCD Laplace sum rules. Physical review. D. 100(7). 12 indexed citations
8.
Chen, Wei, Hua-Xing Chen, Xiang Liu, T. G. Steele, & Shi-Lin Zhu. (2018). Doubly hidden-charm/bottom QQQQ tetraquark states. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 16 indexed citations
9.
Jin, Hong-Ying, et al.. (2018). The Mass and Decay Properties of the 1−+ Light Hybrid Meson. Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings. 294-296. 113–118. 1 indexed citations
10.
Chen, Wei, Hua-Xing Chen, Xiang Liu, T. G. Steele, & Shi-Lin Zhu. (2016). Investigation of the $X(5568)$ as a fully open-flavor $su\bar b\bar d$ tetraquark state. arXiv (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations
11.
Steele, T. G., Zhi-Wei Wang, D. Contreras, & Robert B. Mann. (2014). Viable Dark Matter via Radiative Symmetry Breaking in a Scalar Singlet Higgs Portal Extension of the Standard Model. Physical Review Letters. 112(17). 171602–171602. 42 indexed citations
12.
Zhang, Zhufeng, Hong-Ying Jin, & T. G. Steele. (2014). Revisiting 1 −+ Light Hybrid from Monte-Carlo Based QCD Sum Rules. Chinese Physics Letters. 31(5). 51201–51201. 13 indexed citations
13.
Steele, T. G., Zhi-Wei Wang, D. Contreras, & Robert B. Mann. (2013). Can Radiative Symmetry Breaking Generate Viable Dark Matter Mass and Abundance in a Scalar Singlet Higgs Portal Extension of the Standard Model. arXiv (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations
14.
Steele, T. G. & Zhi-Wei Wang. (2013). Is Radiative Electroweak Symmetry Breaking Consistent with a 125 GeV Higgs Mass?. Physical Review Letters. 110(15). 151601–151601. 21 indexed citations
15.
Zhang, Zhufeng, et al.. (2012). Instanton effect in QCD sum rules for the0++hybrid. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 85(5). 2 indexed citations
16.
Elias, V., D. G. C. McKeon, & T. G. Steele. (2004). Transmutation of scale dependence into truncation uncertainty via renormalization-group improvement of theR(s)series. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 69(4). 3 indexed citations
17.
Elias, V., Robert B. Mann, D. G. C. McKeon, & T. G. Steele. (2003). Radiative Electroweak Symmetry Breaking Revisited. Physical Review Letters. 91(25). 251601–251601. 32 indexed citations
18.
Ahmady, Mohammad, Farrukh Chishtie, V. Elias, et al.. (2002). Three loop estimate of the inclusive semileptonicbcdecay rate. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 65(5). 4 indexed citations
19.
Steele, T. G., et al.. (2001). A gaussian sum-rule analysis of scalar glueballs. Nuclear Physics A. 695(1-4). 205–236. 20 indexed citations
20.
Bagán, E., Mohammad Ahmady, V. Elias, & T. G. Steele. (1994). Plane-wave, coordinate-space, and moment techniques in the operator-product expansion: Equivalence, improved methods, and the heavy quark expansion. The European Physical Journal C. 61(1). 157–170. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026