T. Abrams

1.4k total citations
85 papers, 795 citations indexed

About

T. Abrams is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, T. Abrams has authored 85 papers receiving a total of 795 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 78 papers in Materials Chemistry, 62 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 15 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in T. Abrams's work include Fusion materials and technologies (75 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (62 papers) and Nuclear Materials and Properties (37 papers). T. Abrams is often cited by papers focused on Fusion materials and technologies (75 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (62 papers) and Nuclear Materials and Properties (37 papers). T. Abrams collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. T. Abrams's co-authors include E.A. Unterberg, D.L. Rudakov, P.C. Stangeby, J.D. Elder, W.R. Wampler, A.G. McLean, D. M. Thomas, R. Kaita, J. Guterl and Michael Jaworski and has published in prestigious journals such as Review of Scientific Instruments, Journal of Nuclear Materials and Physics of Plasmas.

In The Last Decade

T. Abrams

78 papers receiving 756 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
T. Abrams United States 18 688 531 106 102 82 85 795
Shuyu Dai China 15 458 0.7× 393 0.7× 102 1.0× 97 1.0× 92 1.1× 83 594
Michael Jaworski United States 17 439 0.6× 404 0.8× 98 0.9× 139 1.4× 144 1.8× 55 616
S. Carpentier‐Chouchana France 13 725 1.1× 457 0.9× 133 1.3× 58 0.6× 179 2.2× 19 844
M. Firdaouss France 18 589 0.9× 455 0.9× 123 1.2× 76 0.7× 219 2.7× 66 736
A. Geier Germany 11 449 0.7× 360 0.7× 65 0.6× 131 1.3× 57 0.7× 23 641
H.G. Esser Germany 16 685 1.0× 515 1.0× 98 0.9× 119 1.2× 125 1.5× 37 785
I. Jepu Romania 16 521 0.8× 242 0.5× 67 0.6× 78 0.8× 71 0.9× 68 644
J.G. Li China 17 541 0.8× 584 1.1× 227 2.1× 102 1.0× 244 3.0× 46 842
V.S. Voitsenya Ukraine 14 467 0.7× 324 0.6× 69 0.7× 145 1.4× 61 0.7× 53 674
K. Sato Japan 9 534 0.8× 299 0.6× 86 0.8× 68 0.7× 119 1.5× 32 717

Countries citing papers authored by T. Abrams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. Abrams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Abrams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Abrams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. Abrams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Abrams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Abrams. The network helps show where T. Abrams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. Abrams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. Abrams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. Abrams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with T. Abrams. T. Abrams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Basaran, Ali C., et al.. (2025). Hydrogen interactions in solution-strengthened niobium-based alloys for direct internal recycling. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 612. 155808–155808. 2 indexed citations
2.
Effenberg, F., Shota Abe, T. Abrams, et al.. (2025). Deuterium retention in pre-lithiated samples and Li–D co-deposits in the DIII-D tokamak. Nuclear Materials and Energy. 43. 101915–101915. 1 indexed citations
3.
Guterl, J., et al.. (2025). Amorphization and siliconization of silicon carbide as a first wall material. Nuclear Fusion. 65(2). 26048–26048.
4.
Abe, Shota, M.J. Simmonds, A. Bortolon, et al.. (2024). Deuterium retention behaviors of boronization films at DIII-D divertor surface. Nuclear Materials and Energy. 42. 101855–101855. 2 indexed citations
5.
Parsons, Matthew, T. Abrams, C. Chrystal, et al.. (2024). Interpretive modeling of tungsten divertor leakage during experiments with neon gas seeding. Nuclear Fusion. 64(9). 96030–96030.
6.
Sizyuk, T., J.N. Brooks, T. Abrams, & A. Hassanein. (2024). Comprehensive new insights on the potential use of SiC as plasma-facing materials in future fusion reactors. Nuclear Fusion. 64(8). 86036–86036. 1 indexed citations
7.
Parsons, Matthew, Sarah Messer, T. Abrams, et al.. (2023). Tungsten erosion and divertor leakage from the DIII-D SAS-VW tungsten-coated divertor in experiments with neon gas seeding. Nuclear Materials and Energy. 37. 101520–101520. 3 indexed citations
8.
Effenberg, F., Shota Abe, T. Abrams, et al.. (2023). In-situ coating of silicon-rich films on tokamak plasma-facing components with real-time Si material injection. Nuclear Fusion. 63(10). 106004–106004. 3 indexed citations
9.
Abrams, T., J. Guterl, Shota Abe, et al.. (2023). Recent DIII-D progress toward validating models of tungsten erosion, re-deposition, and migration for application to next-step fusion devices. Materials Research Express. 10(12). 126503–126503. 7 indexed citations
10.
Buttery, R. J., T. Abrams, L. Casali, et al.. (2023). DIII-D's role as a national user facility in enabling the commercialization of fusion energy. Physics of Plasmas. 30(12). 3 indexed citations
11.
Guterl, J., N. Fedorczak, D.L. Rudakov, et al.. (2023). Model validation of tungsten erosion and redeposition properties using biased tungsten samples on DiMES. Nuclear Materials and Energy. 37. 101551–101551.
14.
Stangeby, P.C., E.A. Unterberg, Jim Davis, et al.. (2022). Developing solid-surface plasma facing components for pilot plants and reactors with replenishable wall claddings and continuous surface conditioning. Part B: required research in present tokamaks. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 64(5). 55003–55003. 3 indexed citations
15.
Effenberg, F., A. Bortolon, H. Frerichs, et al.. (2021). 3D modeling of boron transport in DIII-D L-mode wall conditioning experiments. Nuclear Materials and Energy. 26. 100900–100900. 11 indexed citations
16.
Abe, Shota, C.H. Skinner, J. Guterl, et al.. (2021). Micro-trench measurements of the net deposition of carbon impurity ions in the DIII-D divertor and the resulting suppression of surface erosion. Physica Scripta. 96(12). 124039–124039. 5 indexed citations
17.
Abe, Shota, C.H. Skinner, I. Bykov, et al.. (2021). Determination of the characteristic magnetic pre-sheath length at divertor surfaces using micro-engineered targets on DiMES at DIII-D. Nuclear Fusion. 62(6). 66001–66001. 6 indexed citations
18.
Schmitz, O., T. Abrams, A. Briesemeister, et al.. (2020). Enhanced helium exhaust during edge-localized mode suppression by resonant magnetic perturbations at DIII-D. Nuclear Fusion. 60(5). 54004–54004. 6 indexed citations
19.
Bykov, I., C. Chrobak, T. Abrams, et al.. (2017). Tungsten erosion by unipolar arcing in DIII-D. Physica Scripta. T170. 14034–14034. 24 indexed citations
20.
Frerichs, H., T. Abrams, A. Briesemeister, et al.. (2017). Study of the impact of resonant magnetic perturbation fields on gross tungsten erosion using DiMES samples in DIII-D. Physica Scripta. T170. 14048–14048. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026