Susannah M. Porter

4.5k total citations
63 papers, 3.2k citations indexed

About

Susannah M. Porter is a scholar working on Paleontology, Atmospheric Science and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Susannah M. Porter has authored 63 papers receiving a total of 3.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 55 papers in Paleontology, 38 papers in Atmospheric Science and 9 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Susannah M. Porter's work include Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (55 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (38 papers) and Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology (10 papers). Susannah M. Porter is often cited by papers focused on Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (55 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (38 papers) and Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology (10 papers). Susannah M. Porter collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Susannah M. Porter's co-authors include Andrew H. Knoll, Ralf Meisterfeld, Leigh Anne Riedman, Adam C. Maloof, Samuel A. Bowring, David A. Fike, Carol M. Dehler, Galen P. Halverson, John A. Higgins and F. Ö. Dudás and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Trends in Ecology & Evolution.

In The Last Decade

Susannah M. Porter

61 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Susannah M. Porter United States 30 2.6k 1.4k 745 670 576 63 3.2k
Stanley M. Awramik United States 32 2.2k 0.8× 1.4k 1.0× 570 0.8× 660 1.0× 286 0.5× 70 3.0k
Michael Steiner Germany 36 3.6k 1.4× 1.4k 1.0× 668 0.9× 849 1.3× 1.1k 2.0× 96 4.3k
J. Kaźmierczak Poland 29 1.7k 0.6× 812 0.6× 340 0.5× 581 0.9× 327 0.6× 84 2.8k
Martin D. Brasier United Kingdom 45 3.8k 1.4× 2.2k 1.6× 1.4k 1.8× 903 1.3× 861 1.5× 79 4.8k
James W. Hagadorn United States 33 2.7k 1.0× 1.5k 1.1× 633 0.8× 436 0.7× 682 1.2× 105 3.4k
Andrey Yu. Zhuravlev Russia 32 2.9k 1.1× 1.0k 0.8× 731 1.0× 583 0.9× 900 1.6× 104 3.2k
Tracy D. Frank United States 34 3.0k 1.2× 2.4k 1.7× 1.0k 1.4× 989 1.5× 376 0.7× 94 4.1k
Sara B. Pruss United States 27 2.5k 1.0× 1.1k 0.8× 596 0.8× 734 1.1× 624 1.1× 77 2.9k
Gernot Arp Germany 26 1.6k 0.6× 931 0.7× 262 0.4× 511 0.8× 263 0.5× 82 2.7k
Crispin T. S. Little United Kingdom 33 1.9k 0.7× 1.1k 0.8× 644 0.9× 573 0.9× 1.2k 2.1× 98 3.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Susannah M. Porter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Susannah M. Porter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Susannah M. Porter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susannah M. Porter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Susannah M. Porter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Susannah M. Porter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Susannah M. Porter. The network helps show where Susannah M. Porter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Susannah M. Porter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Susannah M. Porter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Susannah M. Porter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Susannah M. Porter. Susannah M. Porter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Porter, Susannah M., et al.. (2025). Early eukaryote diversity: a review and a reinterpretation. Paleobiology. 51(1). 132–149. 3 indexed citations
2.
Anderson, Ross P., et al.. (2023). Fossilisation processes and our reading of animal antiquity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 38(11). 1060–1071. 10 indexed citations
3.
Dehler, Carol M., et al.. (2023). Precise U-Pb age models refine Neoproterozoic western Laurentian rift initiation, correlation, and Earth system changes. Precambrian Research. 396. 107156–107156. 9 indexed citations
4.
Riedman, Leigh Anne, et al.. (2023). Early eukaryotic microfossils of the late Palaeoproterozoic Limbunya Group, Birrindudu Basin, northern Australia. Papers in Palaeontology. 9(6). 9 indexed citations
5.
Porter, Susannah M., et al.. (2023). Organic preservation of vase‐shaped microfossils from the late Tonian Chuar Group, Grand Canyon, Arizona, USA. Geobiology. 21(3). 290–309. 6 indexed citations
6.
Porter, Susannah M. & Leigh Anne Riedman. (2023). Frameworks for Interpreting the Early Fossil Record of Eukaryotes. Annual Review of Microbiology. 77(1). 173–191. 18 indexed citations
7.
Anderson, Ross P., et al.. (2023). The role of clay minerals in the preservation of Precambrian organic‐walled microfossils. Geobiology. 21(6). 708–724. 7 indexed citations
8.
Planavsky, Noah J., Dan Asael, Alan D. Rooney, et al.. (2022). A sedimentary record of the evolution of the global marine phosphorus cycle. Geobiology. 21(2). 168–174. 25 indexed citations
9.
Cole, Devon B., Daniel B. Mills, Douglas H. Erwin, et al.. (2020). On the co‐evolution of surface oxygen levels and animals. Geobiology. 18(3). 260–281. 109 indexed citations
10.
Porter, Susannah M., et al.. (2020). THE ROLE OF CLAY MINERALS IN THE PRESERVATION OF PRECAMBRIAN ORGANIC-WALLED MICROFOSSILS. Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America. 2 indexed citations
11.
Dahl, Tais W., James N. Connelly, Da Li, et al.. (2019). Atmosphere–ocean oxygen and productivity dynamics during early animal radiations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 116(39). 19352–19361. 95 indexed citations
12.
Wang, Steve C., et al.. (2019). ESTIMATING THE DURATION AND TEMPO OF THE CAMBRIAN EXPLOSION. Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America.
13.
Porter, Susannah M., et al.. (2018). Plywood‐like shell microstructures in hyoliths from the middle Cambrian (Drumian) Gowers Formation, Georgina Basin, Australia. Palaeontology. 61(3). 441–467. 18 indexed citations
14.
Porter, Susannah M.. (2016). Tiny vampires in ancient seas: evidence for predation via perforation in fossils from the 780–740 million-year-old Chuar Group, Grand Canyon, USA. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 283(1831). 20160221–20160221. 66 indexed citations
15.
Porter, Susannah M., et al.. (2016). CHANCELLORIID SCLERITES FROM THE DYERAN–DELAMARAN (“LOWER”–“MIDDLE” CAMBRIAN) BOUNDARY INTERVAL OF THE PIOCHE–CALIENTE REGION, NEVADA, USA. Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America. 2 indexed citations
16.
Brocks, Jochen J., A.J.M. Jarrett, Eva Sirantoine, et al.. (2015). Early sponges and toxic protists: possible sources of cryostane, an age diagnostic biomarker antedating Sturtian Snowball Earth. Geobiology. 14(2). 129–149. 77 indexed citations
17.
Vendrasco, Michael J., et al.. (2010). Shell microstructures in early mollusks. 17 indexed citations
18.
Porter, Susannah M.. (2010). Calcite and aragonite seas and thede novoacquisition of carbonate skeletons. Geobiology. 8(4). 256–277. 115 indexed citations
20.
Porter, Susannah M. & Andrew H. Knoll. (2000). Testate amoebae in the Neoproterozoic Era: evidence from vase-shaped microfossils in the Chuar Group, Grand Canyon. Paleobiology. 26(3). 360–385. 257 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026