Susan van Rooyen

1.2k total citations
9 papers, 721 citations indexed

About

Susan van Rooyen is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Sociology and Political Science and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Susan van Rooyen has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 721 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 2 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Susan van Rooyen's work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (6 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (3 papers) and Academic Writing and Publishing (2 papers). Susan van Rooyen is often cited by papers focused on Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (6 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (3 papers) and Academic Writing and Publishing (2 papers). Susan van Rooyen collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Susan van Rooyen's co-authors include Fiona Godlee, Stephen Evans, Nick Black, Richard Smith, Tony Delamothe and Grant Lewison and has published in prestigious journals such as JAMA, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology and Journal of General Internal Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Susan van Rooyen

9 papers receiving 632 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Susan van Rooyen United Kingdom	8	413	170	125	103	102	9	721
Cenyu Shen Finland	6	354 0.9×	77 0.5×	210 1.7×	20 0.2×	48 0.5×	9	587
Ann C. Weller United States	14	225 0.5×	54 0.3×	90 0.7×	119 1.2×	76 0.7×	28	701
Alexander A. Voronov Russia	10	149 0.4×	78 0.5×	97 0.8×	42 0.4×	27 0.3×	26	346
Kristi Holmes United States	11	117 0.3×	100 0.6×	90 0.7×	100 1.0×	8 0.1×	43	699
Jeffrey Brainard	12	137 0.3×	62 0.4×	105 0.8×	40 0.4×	18 0.2×	81	573
Nadine Desrochers Canada	8	263 0.6×	50 0.3×	100 0.8×	14 0.1×	47 0.5×	19	450
MaryEllen Sievert United States	9	77 0.2×	45 0.3×	74 0.6×	59 0.6×	37 0.4×	23	435
Kyle Siler Canada	14	327 0.8×	44 0.3×	168 1.3×	19 0.2×	36 0.4×	26	633
Heather Howard United States	10	162 0.4×	31 0.2×	101 0.8×	34 0.3×	23 0.2×	39	496
Marzena Świgoń Poland	18	354 0.9×	53 0.3×	215 1.7×	50 0.5×	52 0.5×	66	886

Countries citing papers authored by Susan van Rooyen

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Susan van Rooyen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Susan van Rooyen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susan van Rooyen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Susan van Rooyen

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Susan van Rooyen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Susan van Rooyen. The network helps show where Susan van Rooyen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Susan van Rooyen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Susan van Rooyen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Susan van Rooyen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Susan van Rooyen. Susan van Rooyen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Rooyen, Susan van. (2013). Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of a peer review. 11 indexed citations

2.

Rooyen, Susan van, Tony Delamothe, & Stephen Evans. (2010). Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 341(nov16 2). c5729–c5729. 109 indexed citations

3.

Rooyen, Susan van. (2001). The evaluation of peer‐review quality. Learned Publishing. 14(2). 85–91. 16 indexed citations

4.

Rooyen, Susan van, Nick Black, & Fiona Godlee. (1999). Development of the Review Quality Instrument (RQI) for Assessing Peer Reviews of Manuscripts. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 52(7). 625–629. 115 indexed citations

5.

Rooyen, Susan van, Fiona Godlee, Stephen Evans, Nick Black, & Richard Smith. (1999). Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial. BMJ. 318(7175). 23–27. 247 indexed citations

6.

Lewison, Grant & Susan van Rooyen. (1999). Reviewers’ and editors’ perceptions of submitted manuscripts with different numbers of authors, addresses and funding sources. Journal of Information Science. 25(6). 509–511. 5 indexed citations

7.

Rooyen, Susan van, Fiona Godlee, Stephen Evans, Richard Smith, & Nick Black. (1999). Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 14(10). 622–624. 34 indexed citations

8.

Rooyen, Susan van, et al.. (1998). Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review. JAMA. 280(3). 234–234. 176 indexed citations

9.

Rooyen, Susan van. (1998). A critical examination of the peer review process. Learned Publishing. 11(3). 185–191. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact