Susan K. Greenlee

1.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
11 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Susan K. Greenlee is a scholar working on Environmental Engineering, Water Science and Technology and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Susan K. Greenlee has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Environmental Engineering, 7 papers in Water Science and Technology and 4 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Susan K. Greenlee's work include Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (7 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (7 papers) and Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (2 papers). Susan K. Greenlee is often cited by papers focused on Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (7 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (7 papers) and Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (2 papers). Susan K. Greenlee collaborates with scholars based in United States and Ghana. Susan K. Greenlee's co-authors include Dean B. Gesch, Dean J. Tyler, Michael J. Steuck, Charles A. Nelson, Kristine L. Verdin, Jason M. Stoker, Praveen Kumar, Bruce B. Worstell, Anthony R. Olsen and Naomi E. Detenbeck and has published in prestigious journals such as Advances in Water Resources, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment and Eos.

In The Last Decade

Susan K. Greenlee

11 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

The National Elevation Dataset 2002 2026 2010 2018 2002 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Susan K. Greenlee United States 8 484 406 336 324 286 11 1.2k
Dean J. Tyler United States 8 389 0.8× 395 1.0× 277 0.8× 234 0.7× 224 0.8× 10 1.0k
David Thoma United States 21 362 0.7× 455 1.1× 301 0.9× 192 0.6× 552 1.9× 42 1.3k
Hui Fan China 19 443 0.9× 489 1.2× 227 0.7× 245 0.8× 178 0.6× 45 1.1k
Nik Callow Australia 21 798 1.6× 704 1.7× 366 1.1× 556 1.7× 383 1.3× 83 1.6k
Steffen Zacharias Germany 22 463 1.0× 253 0.6× 350 1.0× 318 1.0× 933 3.3× 62 1.8k
David McJannet Australia 23 877 1.8× 298 0.7× 495 1.5× 570 1.8× 481 1.7× 51 1.6k
Taehee Hwang United States 22 1.3k 2.7× 732 1.8× 492 1.5× 556 1.7× 282 1.0× 48 2.0k
Melita Perčec Tadić Croatia 15 784 1.6× 401 1.0× 693 2.1× 386 1.2× 439 1.5× 29 1.7k
Travis Nauman United States 18 426 0.9× 425 1.0× 153 0.5× 134 0.4× 553 1.9× 38 1.3k
J. Nicholas Van Driel United States 3 511 1.1× 518 1.3× 153 0.5× 187 0.6× 275 1.0× 6 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Susan K. Greenlee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Susan K. Greenlee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Susan K. Greenlee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susan K. Greenlee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Susan K. Greenlee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Susan K. Greenlee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Susan K. Greenlee. The network helps show where Susan K. Greenlee may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Susan K. Greenlee

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Susan K. Greenlee. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Susan K. Greenlee based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Susan K. Greenlee. Susan K. Greenlee is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Stoker, Jason M., et al.. (2013). A conceptual prototype for the next-generation national elevation dataset. Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World. 3 indexed citations
2.
3.
Tyler, Dean J. & Susan K. Greenlee. (2012). Creation of digital contours that approach the characteristics of cartographic contours. Scientific investigations report. 4 indexed citations
4.
Worstell, Bruce B., et al.. (2010). Using Selective Drainage Methods to Extract Continuous Surface Flow from 1-Meter Lidar-Derived Digital Elevation Data. Scientific investigations report. 19 indexed citations
6.
Stoker, Jason M., et al.. (2007). Detection of foliage-obscured vehicle using a multiwavelength polarimetric lidar. 2503–2506. 7 indexed citations
7.
Stoker, Jason M., et al.. (2006). CLICK: The new USGS Center for Lidar Information Coordination and Knowledge. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 72(6). 613–616. 23 indexed citations
8.
Detenbeck, Naomi E., et al.. (2005). Watershed-Based Survey Designs. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 103(1-3). 59–81. 18 indexed citations
9.
Gesch, Dean B., et al.. (2002). The National Elevation Dataset. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 68(1). 5–11. 855 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Kumar, Praveen, Kristine L. Verdin, & Susan K. Greenlee. (2000). Basin level statistical properties of topographic index for North America. Advances in Water Resources. 23(6). 571–578. 23 indexed citations
11.
Gesch, Dean B., Kristine L. Verdin, & Susan K. Greenlee. (1999). New land surface digital elevation model covers the Earth. Eos. 80(6). 69–70. 231 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026