Susan Fager

1.7k total citations
52 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Susan Fager is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Cognitive Neuroscience and Human-Computer Interaction. According to data from OpenAlex, Susan Fager has authored 52 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 40 papers in Occupational Therapy, 19 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 11 papers in Human-Computer Interaction. Recurrent topics in Susan Fager's work include Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (40 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (11 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (9 papers). Susan Fager is often cited by papers focused on Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (40 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (11 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (9 papers). Susan Fager collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Susan Fager's co-authors include David R. Beukelman, Laura J. Ball, Melanie Fried‐Oken, Aimee Dietz, Janice Light, Kathryn M. Yorkston, Judith M. Burnfield, Krista M. Wilkinson, David McNaughton and Elizabeth K. Hanson and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America.

In The Last Decade

Susan Fager

50 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Susan Fager United States 16 644 515 209 187 178 52 1.2k
Melanie Fried‐Oken United States 25 711 1.1× 1.2k 2.3× 349 1.7× 222 1.2× 129 0.7× 93 2.0k
Laura J. Ball United States 17 504 0.8× 380 0.7× 73 0.3× 231 1.2× 219 1.2× 39 1.1k
Aimee Dietz United States 21 609 0.9× 788 1.5× 68 0.3× 134 0.7× 21 0.1× 61 1.2k
Thaís Massetti Brazil 22 114 0.2× 228 0.4× 134 0.6× 83 0.4× 43 0.2× 58 1.1k
Fabrizio Stasolla Italy 25 424 0.7× 653 1.3× 32 0.2× 412 2.2× 11 0.1× 81 1.3k
Tânia Brusque Crocetta Brazil 18 101 0.2× 188 0.4× 112 0.5× 82 0.4× 48 0.3× 59 928
Doretta Oliva Italy 24 1.2k 1.8× 989 1.9× 61 0.3× 364 1.9× 7 0.0× 166 2.1k
Katherine C. Hustad United States 23 525 0.8× 351 0.7× 12 0.1× 658 3.5× 666 3.7× 81 1.8k
Louise Cahill Australia 18 133 0.2× 160 0.3× 11 0.1× 192 1.0× 316 1.8× 44 908
Chwen‐Yng Su Taiwan 17 80 0.1× 233 0.5× 14 0.1× 161 0.9× 75 0.4× 39 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Susan Fager

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Susan Fager's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Susan Fager with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susan Fager more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Susan Fager

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Susan Fager. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Susan Fager. The network helps show where Susan Fager may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Susan Fager

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Susan Fager. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Susan Fager based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Susan Fager. Susan Fager is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Light, Janice, et al.. (2025). Dismantling societal barriers that limit people who need or use AAC: lived experiences, key research findings, and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 41(3). 230–244. 3 indexed citations
2.
Fager, Susan, et al.. (2024). Music, occupational, physical, and speech therapy interventions for patients in disorders of consciousness: An umbrella review. Neurorehabilitation. 54(1). 109–127. 4 indexed citations
3.
Koester, Heidi Horstmann, et al.. (2023). Designing an app for alternative access assessments: Using interviews to uncover and define user needs. Assistive Technology. 36(6). 437–445. 2 indexed citations
4.
Dietz, Aimee, Miechelle McKelvey, Pat Mirenda, et al.. (2022). Lessons for the AAC field: a tribute to Dr. David Beukelman. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 38(2). 77–81. 1 indexed citations
5.
Fager, Susan, et al.. (2019). New and emerging access technologies for adults with complex communication needs and severe motor impairments: State of the science. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 35(1). 13–25. 70 indexed citations
6.
Cler, Gabriel J., et al.. (2019). Optimized and Predictive Phonemic Interfaces for Augmentative and Alternative Communication. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 62(7). 2065–2081. 7 indexed citations
9.
Fager, Susan. (2017). Speech Recognition as a Practice Tool for Dysarthria. Seminars in Speech and Language. 38(3). 220–228. 4 indexed citations
10.
Cler, Gabriel J., Alfonso Nieto-Castañón, Frank H. Guenther, Susan Fager, & Cara E. Stepp. (2016). Surface electromyographic control of a novel phonemic interface for speech synthesis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 32(2). 120–130. 7 indexed citations
11.
Fager, Susan & Judith M. Burnfield. (2015). Speech Recognition for Environmental Control: Effect of Microphone Type, Dysarthria, and Severity on Recognition Results. Assistive Technology. 27(4). 199–207. 3 indexed citations
12.
Fager, Susan & Judith M. Burnfield. (2013). Patients' experiences with technology during inpatient rehabilitation: opportunities to support independence and therapeutic engagement. Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology. 9(2). 121–127. 34 indexed citations
13.
Fager, Susan, et al.. (2012). Representation of Potential Communication Items in Medical Settings: An Intervention Note. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 28(3). 190–196. 1 indexed citations
14.
Ball, Laura J., Susan Fager, & Melanie Fried‐Oken. (2012). Augmentative and Alternative Communication for People with Progressive Neuromuscular Disease. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America. 23(3). 689–699. 23 indexed citations
15.
Fager, Susan, et al.. (2012). Access to augmentative and alternative communication: New technologies and clinical decision-making. Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine. 5(1). 53–61. 45 indexed citations
16.
Fager, Susan, et al.. (2012). Access Interface Strategies. Assistive Technology. 24(1). 25–33. 62 indexed citations
17.
Ball, Laura J., et al.. (2010). Late AAC Assessment for Individuals with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. 18(1). 48–54. 14 indexed citations
18.
Fager, Susan, et al.. (2010). Evaluation of a Speech Recognition Prototype for Speakers with Moderate and Severe Dysarthria: A Preliminary Report. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 26(4). 267–277. 25 indexed citations
19.
Beukelman, David R., Laura J. Ball, & Susan Fager. (2008). An AAC Personnel Framework: Adults with Acquired Complex Communication Needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 24(3). 255–267. 59 indexed citations
20.
Beukelman, David R., Susan Fager, Laura J. Ball, & Aimee Dietz. (2007). AAC for adults with acquired neurological conditions: A review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 23(3). 230–242. 172 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026