Susan E. Cole

1.4k total citations
32 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Susan E. Cole is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics and Cancer Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Susan E. Cole has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Molecular Biology, 9 papers in Genetics and 4 papers in Cancer Research. Recurrent topics in Susan E. Cole's work include Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (12 papers), Congenital heart defects research (11 papers) and Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (4 papers). Susan E. Cole is often cited by papers focused on Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (12 papers), Congenital heart defects research (11 papers) and Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (4 papers). Susan E. Cole collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Susan E. Cole's co-authors include Thomas Vogt, John M. Levorse, Shirley M. Tilghman, Roger H. Reeves, Gillian Turner, Ariadna Perez‐Balaguer, Mariano S. Viapiano, Mohan S. Nandhu, Bin Hu and John D. Franklin and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Cell Biology, Development and Hepatology.

In The Last Decade

Susan E. Cole

31 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Susan E. Cole United States 18 753 151 132 117 106 32 1.1k
Daniel N. Duong United States 8 590 0.8× 68 0.5× 75 0.6× 78 0.7× 91 0.9× 10 1.2k
Caroline J. Formstone United Kingdom 18 665 0.9× 158 1.0× 84 0.6× 32 0.3× 95 0.9× 26 1.1k
Hisaki Hayashi Japan 14 557 0.7× 47 0.3× 103 0.8× 31 0.3× 85 0.8× 26 788
Jennifer L. Lucitti United States 13 533 0.7× 41 0.3× 95 0.7× 105 0.9× 142 1.3× 16 925
James M. Dunn Canada 14 749 1.0× 145 1.0× 106 0.8× 93 0.8× 94 0.9× 29 1.3k
Marianne Steiner Austria 15 591 0.8× 54 0.4× 132 1.0× 33 0.3× 98 0.9× 25 934
Sverker Nystedt Sweden 11 656 0.9× 174 1.2× 103 0.8× 253 2.2× 37 0.3× 11 2.2k
Joseph B. Kearney United States 9 688 0.9× 148 1.0× 64 0.5× 27 0.2× 67 0.6× 10 988
Lauren M. Goddard United States 8 396 0.5× 50 0.3× 73 0.6× 69 0.6× 112 1.1× 9 868
Cataldo Schietroma United States 13 694 0.9× 47 0.3× 40 0.3× 48 0.4× 50 0.5× 17 955

Countries citing papers authored by Susan E. Cole

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Susan E. Cole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Susan E. Cole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susan E. Cole more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Susan E. Cole

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Susan E. Cole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Susan E. Cole. The network helps show where Susan E. Cole may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Susan E. Cole

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Susan E. Cole. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Susan E. Cole based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Susan E. Cole. Susan E. Cole is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Calomeni, Edward, et al.. (2016). Collagen Fibril Ultrastructure in Mice Lacking Discoidin Domain Receptor 1. Microscopy and Microanalysis. 22(3). 599–611. 20 indexed citations
3.
D’Amato, Gaetano, Guillermo Luxán, Gonzalo del Monte‐Nieto, et al.. (2015). Sequential Notch activation regulates ventricular chamber development. Nature Cell Biology. 18(1). 7–20. 139 indexed citations
4.
Nandhu, Mohan S., Bin Hu, Susan E. Cole, et al.. (2014). Novel Paracrine Modulation of Notch–DLL4 Signaling by Fibulin-3 Promotes Angiogenesis in High-Grade Gliomas. Cancer Research. 74(19). 5435–5448. 36 indexed citations
5.
Cole, Susan E., et al.. (2014). Posterior skeletal development and the segmentation clock period are sensitive to Lfng dosage during somitogenesis. Developmental Biology. 388(2). 159–169. 15 indexed citations
6.
Cole, Susan E., et al.. (2014). The many roles of Notch signaling during vertebrate somitogenesis. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology. 49. 68–75. 35 indexed citations
7.
Nuovo, Gerard J., et al.. (2013). mir-125a-5p-Mediated Regulation of Lfng Is Essential for the Avian Segmentation Clock. Developmental Cell. 24(5). 554–561. 23 indexed citations
8.
Hu, Bin, Mohan S. Nandhu, Hosung Sim, et al.. (2012). Fibulin-3 Promotes Glioma Growth and Resistance through a Novel Paracrine Regulation of Notch Signaling. Cancer Research. 72(15). 3873–3885. 75 indexed citations
9.
McBride, Kim L., et al.. (2010). NOTCH1 missense alleles associated with left ventricular outflow tract defects exhibit impaired receptor processing and defective EMT. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease. 1812(1). 121–129. 23 indexed citations
10.
Moran, Jennifer L., John M. Levorse, Shyamala Mani, et al.. (2009). Manic fringe is not required for embryonic development, and fringe family members do not exhibit redundant functions in the axial skeleton, limb, or hindbrain. Developmental Dynamics. 238(7). 1803–1812. 38 indexed citations
11.
Ryan, Matthew J., Christina Bales, Andrew J. D. Nelson, et al.. (2008). Bile duct proliferation in Jag1 /fringe heterozygous mice identifies candidate modifiers of the alagille syndrome hepatic phenotype. Hepatology. 48(6). 1989–1997. 64 indexed citations
12.
Cole, Susan E., et al.. (2007). The vertebrate segmentation clock and its role in skeletal birth defects. Birth Defects Research Part C Embryo Today Reviews. 81(2). 121–133. 28 indexed citations
13.
Cole, Susan E., John M. Levorse, Shirley M. Tilghman, & Thomas Vogt. (2002). Clock Regulatory Elements Control Cyclic Expression of Lunatic fringe during Somitogenesis. Developmental Cell. 3(1). 75–84. 99 indexed citations
14.
15.
Bohne, Jens, Susan E. Cole, Carlos Suñé, et al.. (2000). Expression analysis and mapping of the mouse and human transcriptional regulator CA150. Mammalian Genome. 11(10). 930–933. 7 indexed citations
16.
Wiltshire, Tim, Mathew T. Pletcher, Susan E. Cole, et al.. (1999). Perfect Conserved Linkage Across the Entire Mouse Chromosome 10 Region Homologous to Human Chromosome 21. Genome Research. 9(12). 1214–1222. 16 indexed citations
17.
Cole, Susan E., Tim Wiltshire, Dwight M. Morrow, et al.. (1999). High-resolution comparative physical mapping of mouse Chromosome 10 in the region of homology with human Chromosome 21. Mammalian Genome. 10(3). 229–234. 8 indexed citations
18.
Cole, Susan E., Tim Wiltshire, & Roger H. Reeves. (1998). Physical Mapping of the Evolutionary Boundary between Human Chromosomes 21 and 22 on Mouse Chromosome 10. Genomics. 50(1). 109–111. 8 indexed citations
19.
Cole, Susan E. & Roger H. Reeves. (1998). A Cluster of Keratin-Associated Proteins on Mouse Chromosome 10 in the Region of Conserved Linkage with Human Chromosome 21. Genomics. 54(3). 437–442. 15 indexed citations
20.
Cabin, Deborah E., et al.. (1995). Assessment of a mutation in the H5 domain of Girk2 as a candidate for the weaver mutation.. Genome Research. 5(5). 453–463. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026