This map shows the geographic impact of Susan Boyd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Susan Boyd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susan Boyd more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Susan Boyd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Susan Boyd. The network helps show where Susan Boyd may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Susan Boyd
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Susan Boyd.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Susan Boyd based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Susan Boyd. Susan Boyd is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Boyd, Susan, et al.. (2015). Violence Against Women and the B.C. Family Law Act: Early Jurisprudence. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
3.
Boyd, Susan, et al.. (2015). "Race Is Not a Determinative Factor": Mixed Race Children and Custody Cases in Canada. eYLS (Yale Law School). 29(2). 309.
4.
Boyd, Susan. (2014). Consent, Coercion, and Shared Parenting: Ruffudeen-Coutts v Coutts. 28(2). 279.1 indexed citations
5.
Boyd, Susan. (2011). Relocation, Indeterminacy, and Burden of Proof: Lessons from Canada. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
6.
Boyd, Susan. (2011). Motherhood and Autonomy in a Shared Parenting Climate. SSRN Electronic Journal.
7.
Boyd, Susan. (2010). Joint Custody and Guardianship in the British Columbia Courts: Not a Cautious Approach. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
8.
Chunn, Dorothy E., et al.. (2007). Reaction and resistance : feminism, law, and social change. eYLS (Yale Law School).60 indexed citations
9.
Boyd, Susan. (2007). Gendering Legal Parenthood: Bio-Genetic Ties, Intentionality and Responsibility. eYLS (Yale Law School). 25(1). 63.10 indexed citations
10.
Boyd, Susan. (2004). Demonizing Mothers: Fathers' Rights Discourses in Child Custody Law Reform Processes. eYLS (Yale Law School).21 indexed citations
11.
Boyd, Susan. (2004). Backlash Against Feminism: Custody and Access Reform Debates of the Late 20th Century. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit. 16(2). 255.2 indexed citations
12.
Boyd, Susan, et al.. (2004). Feminism, Law, and Public Policy: Family Feuds and Taxing Times. eYLS (Yale Law School). 42(4). 545–582.7 indexed citations
Boyd, Susan, et al.. (2002). From Same-Sex to No Sex? Trends Towards Recognition of (Same-Sex) Relationships in Canada. Seattle journal for social justice. 1(3). 217.7 indexed citations
16.
Boyd, Susan. (2001). Backlash and the Construction of Legal Knowledge: The Case of Child Custody Law. eYLS (Yale Law School). 16(2). 255.3 indexed citations
Boyd, Susan. (1996). Can Law Challenge the Public/Private Divide? Women, Work, and Family. eYLS (Yale Law School). 15. 161.4 indexed citations
19.
Boyd, Susan. (1991). Some Postmodernist Challenges to Feminist Analyses of Law, Family and State: Ideology and Discourse in Child Custody Law. SSRN Electronic Journal.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.